Created the following ticket:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-1455

Trying it with annotation approach, I am getting exception during bundle
installation and installation fails.

Cheers,

On Thu, 19 Nov 2015 at 20:33 Christian Schneider <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Sounds like a valid problem. Can you open a jira issue for it?
> Do you also observe this problem when using the new transaction
> blueprint 2.0.0 using annotations?
>
> Christian
>
> Am 19.11.2015 um 16:04 schrieb mhshams:
> > Sorry for the very late reply. I just got some time to debug the code
> and I
> > think I found the issue.
> >
> > The issue is reproducible by nesting the bean definition inside service
> > definition in blueprint xml.
> >
> > <service interface="com.foo.MyDao">
> >          <bean class="com.foo.impl.MyDaoImpl">
> >              <tx:transaction method="*" value="Required"/>
> >          </bean>
> > </service>
> >
> > As a workaround I can change the above definition to following:
> >
> > <bean id="myBean" class="com.foo.impl.MyDaoImpl">
> >       <tx:transaction method="*" value="Required"/>
> > </bean>
> > <service interface="com.foo.MyDao">
> >      <ref component-id="myBean" />
> > </service>
> >
> > The root cause (probably a bug) is the process method in
> > "JpaComponentProcessor" class in aries jpa blueprint:
> >
> > Set<String> components = new
> > HashSet<String>(cdr.getComponentDefinitionNames());
> > for (String component : components) {
> >       ComponentMetadata compDef = cdr.getComponentDefinition(component);
> >       if (compDef instanceof MutableBeanMetadata &&
> > !((MutableBeanMetadata)compDef).isProcessor()) {
> >                  handleComponent((MutableBeanMetadata)compDef, bundle,
> cdr,
> > container);
> >       }
> > }
> >
> > Above code is checking if component definition is an instance of
> > "MutableBeanMetadata" which is not the case when the bean definition is
> > nested in service definition. instead it is an instance of
> > "MutableServiceMetadata"
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mohammad Shamsi
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Problem-with-JPA-2-2-0-in-Karaf-4-0-2-tp4043078p4043623.html
> > Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>

Reply via email to