I am curious,  do you this an exception like this in the child instance log 
file?

2015-12-03 08:48:03,154 | WARN  | 8]-nio2-thread-1 | ServerSession              
      | 1 - org.apache.sshd.core - 0.14.0 | Exception caught
java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
        at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)[:1.8.0_45]
        at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)[:1.8.0_45]
        at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:223)[:1.8.0_45]
        at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:197)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
sun.nio.ch.UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.implRead(UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:508)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:276)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:297)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
java.nio.channels.AsynchronousSocketChannel.read(AsynchronousSocketChannel.java:420)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2Session.startReading(Nio2Session.java:170)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
        at 
org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2Acceptor$AcceptCompletionHandler.onCompleted(Nio2Acceptor.java:135)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
        at 
org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2Acceptor$AcceptCompletionHandler.onCompleted(Nio2Acceptor.java:120)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
        at 
org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2CompletionHandler$1.run(Nio2CompletionHandler.java:32)
        at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2CompletionHandler.completed(Nio2CompletionHandler.java:30)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
        at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126)[:1.8.0_45]
        at sun.nio.ch.Invoker$2.run(Invoker.java:218)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl$1.run(AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl.java:112)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)[:1.8.0_45]
        at 
java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)[:1.8.0_45]
        at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)[:1.8.0_45]




> On Dec 3, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It works also in Karaf: actually, I extended the Karaf itests about instances 
> with it.
> 
> So, it's probably something in your custom distribution or environment/code.
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 12/03/2015 02:43 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>> Hi JB,
>> 
>> Yes, it works for Cellar,  I can confirm this from a test I did with a 
>> slightly modified CellarTestSupport.  However, if I move this same class to 
>> my project, then it fails.  So, something is different, perhaps in the 
>> dependencies, that is causing this.   I will keep researching and report 
>> back here any findings.
>> 
>>  Thanks for taking the time to help!
>> 
>>> On Dec 3, 2015, at 2:05 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Alex,
>>> 
>>> I added an itest in Karaf that does:
>>> 
>>>    @Test
>>>    public void createStartCommand() throws Exception {
>>>        System.out.println(executeCommand("instance:create itest"));
>>>        assertContains("itest", executeCommand("instance:list"));
>>>        System.out.println(executeCommand("instance:start itest"));
>>>        Thread.sleep(5000);
>>>        String output = executeCommand("instance:status itest");
>>>        System.out.println("itest instance status: " + output);
>>>        assertContains("Started", output);
>>>        System.out.println(executeCommand("instance:stop itest"));
>>>        Thread.sleep(5000);
>>>        output = executeCommand("instance:status itest");
>>>        System.out.println("itest instance status: " + output);
>>>        assertContains("Stopped", output);
>>>    }
>>> 
>>> and it works fine: the itest instance goes in Started instance. I added a 
>>> sleep just to give time to the instance to start (else we may have Starting 
>>> during the interval).
>>> 
>>> We are using Pax Exam 4.6.0 for now, I'm upgrading to 4.7.0 to see if 
>>> there's an impact.
>>> 
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>> 
>>> On 12/02/2015 06:54 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>>>> Correct.
>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 12:52 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> You use Karaf 4.0.3 right ?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Let me check in Karaf itest.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> JB
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12/02/2015 06:15 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>>>>>> Hi JB,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I was able to narrow it down to this line in my @Configuration method:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> configureConsole().ignoreLocalConsole().ignoreRemoteShell(),
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> With the above option, the root instance never finishes initializing:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   SSH Port | RMI Registry | RMI Server | State    | PID  | Name
>>>>>>   -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>        8101 |         1099 |      44444 | Starting | 7354 | root
>>>>>>        8102 |         1100 |      44445 | Stopped  | 0    | LA1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Without it, the root instance initializes successfully, but not the
>>>>>> child instance:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   SSH Port | RMI Registry | RMI Server | State   | PID  | Name
>>>>>>   ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>        8101 |         1099 |      44444 | Started | 7240 | root
>>>>>>        8102 |         1100 |      44445 | Stopped | 0    | LA1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> and this exception is thrown in the logs:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>   2015-12-02 12:08:03,103 | INFO  | 1]-nio2-thread-2 | ServerSession
>>>>>>                      | 1 - org.apache.sshd.core - 0.14.0 | Server
>>>>>>   session created from /127.0.0.1:53673
>>>>>>   2015-12-02 12:08:03,103 | WARN  | 1]-nio2-thread-2 | ServerSession
>>>>>>                      | 1 - org.apache.sshd.core - 0.14.0 | Exception
>>>>>>   caught
>>>>>>   java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
>>>>>>   at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:223)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:197)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.implRead(UnixAsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:508)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:276)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.read(AsynchronousSocketChannelImpl.java:297)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> java.nio.channels.AsynchronousSocketChannel.read(AsynchronousSocketChannel.java:420)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2Session.startReading(Nio2Session.java:170)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2Acceptor$AcceptCompletionHandler.onCompleted(Nio2Acceptor.java:135)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2Acceptor$AcceptCompletionHandler.onCompleted(Nio2Acceptor.java:120)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2CompletionHandler$1.run(Nio2CompletionHandler.java:32)
>>>>>>   at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native
>>>>>> Method)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> org.apache.sshd.common.io.nio2.Nio2CompletionHandler.completed(Nio2CompletionHandler.java:30)[1:org.apache.sshd.core:0.14.0]
>>>>>>   at sun.nio.ch.Invoker.invokeUnchecked(Invoker.java:126)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at sun.nio.ch.Invoker$2.run(Invoker.java:218)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> sun.nio.ch.AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl$1.run(AsynchronousChannelGroupImpl.java:112)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at
>>>>>>   
>>>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>>   at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)[:1.8.0_45]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Any idea what is going on?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 11:12 AM, Alex Soto <[email protected]
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I am using very similar method, using the executeCommand,  almost
>>>>>>> identical to how Cellar is doing it.
>>>>>>> I see the instance directory being created but there is nothing in the
>>>>>>> log file of the child instance.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks for the help!
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Dec 2, 2015, at 10:34 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's @Ignore due to some hazelcast issue. I will re-enable it.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> With Karaf 4.0.0, you can see:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  protected void createCellarChild(String name, boolean debug, int
>>>>>>>> port) {
>>>>>>>>      int instances = 0;
>>>>>>>>      String createCommand = "instance:create --featureURL " +
>>>>>>>> System.getProperty("cellar.feature.url") + " --feature cellar ";
>>>>>>>>      if (debug && port > 0) {
>>>>>>>>          createCommand = createCommand + String.format(DEBUG_OPTS,
>>>>>>>> port);
>>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>>      System.err.println(executeCommand(createCommand + " " + name));
>>>>>>>>      System.err.println(executeCommand("instance:start " + name));
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      //Wait till the node is listed as Starting
>>>>>>>>      System.err.print("Waiting for " + name + " to start ");
>>>>>>>>      for (int i = 0; i < 5 && instances == 0; i++) {
>>>>>>>>          String response = executeCommand("instance:list | grep " +
>>>>>>>> name + " | grep -c " + INSTANCE_STARTED, COMMAND_TIMEOUT, true);
>>>>>>>>          instances = Integer.parseInt(response.trim());
>>>>>>>>          System.err.print(".");
>>>>>>>>          try {
>>>>>>>>              Thread.sleep(3000);
>>>>>>>>          } catch (InterruptedException e) {
>>>>>>>>              //Ignore
>>>>>>>>          }
>>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>      if (instances > 0) {
>>>>>>>>          System.err.println(".Started!");
>>>>>>>>      } else {
>>>>>>>>          System.err.println(".Timed Out!");
>>>>>>>>      }
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>  }
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> It's what I used and it should work.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do you do the same ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do you use the Instance service directly or the commands ?
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On 12/02/2015 04:27 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Downloaded Cellar from the
>>>>>>>>> Headathttps://github.com/apache/karaf-cellar
>>>>>>>>> All Integration Tests have the @Ignore annotation.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Is anybody able to launch a second Karaf instance from a Pax-Exam
>>>>>>>>> integration test?
>>>>>>>>> If so, can you point me to a working example?
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 3:12 PM, Alex Soto <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Hmm,  I tried downloading Cellar and all the mirrors fail with not
>>>>>>>>>> found error.
>>>>>>>>>> How do I get the source code?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 3:00 PM, Alex Soto <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> JB:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, it works outside of Pax-Exam.
>>>>>>>>>>> I will take a look at Cellar.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 1, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Alex,
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess it works fine "outside" of Pax Exam, right ?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> You can take a look on Cellar as I use instance to simulate
>>>>>>>>>>>> multiple
>>>>>>>>>>>> nodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let me try with 4.0.3.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> JB
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2015 08:16 PM, Alex Soto wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am using Karaf version 4.0.3. In my integration test I want to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> launch
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a second instance of Karaf, but it always times out, so I am now
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wondering if it is because the root instance is not yet finished
>>>>>>>>>>>>> starting.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> In order to troubleshoot this issue, I have now added the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ‘instance:list’ command to my test:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> String listOutput = executeCommand("instance:list");
>>>>>>>>>>>>> log.info(listOutput);
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I call the above from my @Test method, but the output always
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SSH Port | RMI Registry | RMI Server | State    | PID  | Name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8101 |         1099 |      44444 | Starting | 2914 | root
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> No matter how much I wait, it always shows the same status.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meaning the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> container never finishes starting. I can manually run the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> exact same
>>>>>>>>>>>>> container that was created under 'target/exam/<guid>’ folder,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and issue
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the above command and get:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> SSH Port | RMI Registry | RMI Server | State   | PID  | Name
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 8101 |         1099 |      44444 | Started | 3409 | root
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, it appears to be some kind of issue with the way the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PAM-EXAM test
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is wired.  I have added this dependency to try to cope with the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Inject
>>>>>>>>>>>>> @Filter(timeout = SERVICE_TIMEOUT)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> protected BootFinished bootFinished;
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but so far, I have not been able to solve it.  As I said
>>>>>>>>>>>>> before, my
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ultimate goal is to run a child instance, but I suspect that won’t
>>>>>>>>>>>>> happen until the main instance is successfully started.  Any
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hints?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alex Soto
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://blog.nanthrax.net/><http://blog.nanthrax.net/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Talend -http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://www.talend.com/><http://www.talend.com/>
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>>>>>>> <http://blog.nanthrax.net/><http://blog.nanthrax.net/>
>>>>>>>> Talend -http://www.talend.com
>>>>>>>> <http://www.talend.com/><http://www.talend.com/>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net <http://blog.nanthrax.net/>
>>>>> Talend -http://www.talend.com <http://www.talend.com/>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [email protected]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to