Yes, I agree about JPA: it's due to changes in Aries JPA. It was
backward compatible if you install the same previous versions, but the
behaviour changed "out of the box". It was a mistake that we did IMHO
(at least in term of documentation): be sure next time we will be more
"vigilant".
Regards
JB
On 01/19/2016 12:08 PM, ellirael wrote:
Thanks for an answer. But I cannot completely agree with you. One of 4.0.x
release seriously changed ways of working with jpa and transactions. But
yes, with backward compatibility.
--
View this message in context:
http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/ANN-Apache-Karaf-4-0-4-released-tp4044829p4044913.html
Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[email protected]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
