... in case anyone wants to see the behavior with newer versions...
karaf@root> features:chooseurl cxf-dosgi 1.7.0
Adding feature url mvn:org.apache.cxf.dosgi/cxf-dosgi/1.7.0/xml/features
karaf@root> features:install cxf-dosgi-discovery-distributed
Error executing command: Can't install feature
cxf-dosgi-discovery-distributed/0.0.0:
Could not start bundle mvn:org.apache.cxf.dosgi/cxf-dosgi-ri-dsw-cxf/1.7.0
in feature(s) cxf-dosgi-core-1.7.0: Unresolved constraint in bundle
cxf-dosgi-ri-dsw-cxf [317]: Unable to resolve 317.0: missing requirement
[317.0] osgi.wiring.package;
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf)(version>=3.1.0)(!(version>=4.0.0)))
(ok, I assume it requires CXF>=3.1.0)
karaf@root> features:chooseurl cxf 3.1.0
Adding feature url mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/3.1.0/xml/features
karaf@root> features:install cxf/3.1.0
Error executing command: Can't install feature cxf/3.1.0:
Could not start bundle
mvn:org.apache.wss4j/wss4j-ws-security-policy-stax/2.1.0 in feature(s)
wss4j-2.1.0: Uses constraint violation. Unable to resolve bundle revision
org.apache.wss4j.wss4j-ws-security-stax [299.0] because it is exposed to
package 'org.joda.time' from bundle revisions joda-time [294.0] and
org.apache.servicemix.bundles.joda-time [8.0] via two dependency chains.
Chain 1:
org.apache.wss4j.wss4j-ws-security-stax [299.0]
import:
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.joda.time)(version>=2.7.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
|
export: osgi.wiring.package=org.joda.time
joda-time [294.0]
Chain 2:
org.apache.wss4j.wss4j-ws-security-stax [299.0]
import: (osgi.wiring.package=org.opensaml.xmlsec.signature.support)
|
export: osgi.wiring.package=org.opensaml.xmlsec.signature.support;
uses:=org.joda.time
org.apache.servicemix.bundles.opensaml [293.0]
import:
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.joda.time)(version>=2.2.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
|
export: osgi.wiring.package=org.joda.time
org.apache.servicemix.bundles.joda-time [8.0]
What!?
Thanks, Rodolfo.
2016-02-18 17:30 GMT+01:00 Rodolfo Alcazar Portillo <
[email protected]>:
> Hi, my first time on the list :)
>
> I'm using karaf 2.4.1 (can't change version) and want to test dosgi. I'm
> following some tutorials, mainly lessons 4 & 8 in
> http://www.liquid-reality.de/, but can't make dosgi startup in karaf. I'm
> stucked here (the versions shown below give the less errors, others give
> thougher errors):
>
> karaf@root> features:chooseurl cxf-dosgi 1.4.0
> Adding feature url mvn:org.apache.cxf.dosgi/cxf-dosgi/1.4.0/xml/features
>
> (good!)
>
> karaf@root> features:install cxf-dosgi-discovery-distributed
> Error executing command: Can't install feature
> cxf-dosgi-discovery-distributed/0.0.0:
> Could not start bundle mvn:org.apache.cxf.dosgi/cxf-dosgi-ri-dsw-cxf/1.4.0
> in feature(s) cxf-dosgi-core-1.4.0: Unresolved constraint in bundle
> cxf-dosgi-ri-dsw-cxf [216]: Unable to resolve 216.0: missing requirement
> [216.0] osgi.wiring.package;
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf)(version>=2.7.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
>
> (oops, ok, let's provide cxf)...
>
> karaf@root> features:chooseurl cxf 2.7.4
> Adding feature url mvn:org.apache.cxf.karaf/apache-cxf/2.7.4/xml/features
>
> (ok)
>
> karaf@root> features:install cxf
>
> (ok, and here we go again:)
>
> karaf@root> features:install cxf-dosgi-discovery-distributed
> Error executing command: Can't install feature
> cxf-dosgi-discovery-distributed/0.0.0:
> Could not start bundle mvn:org.apache.cxf.dosgi/cxf-dosgi-ri-dsw-cxf/1.4.0
> in feature(s) cxf-dosgi-core-1.4.0: Unresolved constraint in bundle
> cxf-dosgi-ri-dsw-cxf [223]: Unable to resolve 223.0: missing requirement
> [223.0] osgi.wiring.package;
> (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.cxf)(version>=2.7.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
>
> karaf@root> list|grep cxf
> [ 197] [Active ] [Created ] [ ] [ 50] camel-cxf-transport
> (2.14.1)
> [ 198] [Active ] [Created ] [ ] [ 50] camel-cxf (2.14.1)
>
> Why? I'm on the right version, providing the right package! As said, with
> other versions I get other errors, mainly if I use cxf 3.1.0 or higher :
> google for "joda-time via two dependency chains"
>
> Any help on this will be welcome, thanks in advance.
>
> Greets. R.
>
>
