Hi Martin, I'm still in favor of using plain Karaf with Web-Container instead of the opposite, but I can see the benefits for easier transition of doing the bridge thing. Thanks to the Help of Serge, we now have a special branch [1], cause the bridge is still work-in-progress [2].
regards, Achim [1] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/tree/PAXWEB-606-Servlet-Bridge [2] - https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-606 2016-03-29 16:45 GMT+02:00 mjelen <[email protected]>: > Hi Serge, > > thank you for your reply! I'll look into the PAX Web Bridge, I guess the > right place to talk about it is the OPS4J Google Group. > > I admit I haven't thought of looking at PAX Web for my purpose because I'd > seen it as having the opposite purpose of what I'm looking for - that is, > starting an embedded Tomcat (or Jetty or Undertow) rather than running > inside a Tomcat instance. Especially since I've read several comments from > Achim dissuading people from embedding Karaf in Tomcat (which I can > understand, I'm not happy about it myself and I'll keep trying to get rid > of > this requirement). > > Regards > Martin > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Embedding-Karaf-in-a-WAR-Tomcat-tp4045931p4046031.html > Sent from the Karaf - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
