Hi, an alias feature is a wrapper feature just containing another feature.
The reason why we did this is that the http, jetty features were in Karaf before (not in pax-web). So, we created the pax-web features with a different name: pax-web-jetty instead of jetty. However, legacy and other projects/applications use the "old" name. So, for backward compatibility, we created this "alias"/wrap feature.
Regards JB On 07/13/2016 04:56 AM, Allan C. wrote:
Hi JB, Just seeking clarifications. 1. When you say jetty is an alias feature, what does alias feature means? 2. Is it safe to say pax-jetty depends on jetty and not the other way round? Thanks in advance. Regards, Allan C. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:01 AM, Allan C. <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Noted. Thanks. Regards, Allan C. On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 3:40 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks Allan, jetty is an alias feature on top of pax-jetty (for backward compatibility). Definitely, we upgraded in pax-web, but forgot to update the jetty alias feature. Let me create a Jira to fix that. Thanks ! Regards JB On 07/04/2016 10:20 AM, Allan C. wrote: I am playing around with 4.0.5 and I noticed that the versions for the jetty and pax-jetty are different. In Fuse 6.2.1 (I think it is based on Karaf 2.4.0), the versions are the same. JBossFuse:karaf@root> features:list | grep jetty [installed ] [*8.1.17.v20150415* ] jetty karaf-2.4.0.redhat-621084 Provide Jetty engine support [installed ] [2.15.1.redhat-621084 ] camel-jetty camel-2.15.1.redhat-621084 [uninstalled] [2.15.1.redhat-621084 ] camel-jetty9 camel-2.15.1.redhat-621084 [installed ] [*8.1.17.v20150415* ] pax-jetty org.ops4j.pax.web-3.2.5 Provide Jetty engine support [installed ] [3.0.4.redhat-621084 ] cxf-http-jetty cxf-3.0.4.redhat-621084 Karaf 4.0.5: karaf@root(feature)> list | grep jetty jetty | *9.2.10.v20150310* | | Started | standard-4.0.5 | jetty | 8.1.14.v20131031 | | Uninstalled | standard-4.0.5 | cxf-http-jetty | 3.1.5 | | Started | cxf-3.1.5 | pax-jetty | *9.2.15.v20160210* | | Started | org.ops4j.pax.web-4.2.6 | Provide Jetty engine support pax-jetty-spdy | 4.2.6 | | Uninstalled | org.ops4j.pax.web-4.2.6 | Optional additional feature to run Jetty with SPDY pax-http-jetty | 4.2.6 | | Started | org.ops4j.pax.web-4.2.6 | camel-jetty | 2.16.3 | | Uninstalled | camel-2.16.3 | camel-jetty9 | 2.16.3 | | Started | camel-2.16.3 | karaf@root(feature)> Would it be a concern? Regards, Allan C. -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
-- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
