I resolved the issue that was causing the misleading display but I’ll spend a 
little time to see if I can recreate it. No promises but I’ll try.

From: Guillaume Nodet [mailto:gno...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 1:43 PM
To: user <user@karaf.apache.org>
Subject: Re: scr:details command

Could you provide the full command output please ?

2016-09-20 18:13 GMT+02:00 Leschke, Scott 
This is the Karaf scr:details command.  It also says that the reference is 
mandatory (Optional : mandatory) and scr:info says Cardinality: 1..1.

So I guess I’m still at how a mandatory reference be unbound but still be 
satisfied?  Hmmm.

From: David Jencks 
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 11:05 AM
To: user@karaf.apache.org<mailto:user@karaf.apache.org>
Subject: Re: scr:details command

- minimum cardinality 0, so it’s always satisfied
- the component is not satisfied for some other reason so nothing is bound to 
any reference.

I think this is the karaf scr command so I might be wrong about the meaning.

david jencks

On Sep 20, 2016, at 8:33 AM, Leschke, Scott 
<slesc...@medline.com<mailto:slesc...@medline.com>> wrote:

I’m confused. What does it mean if scr:details says:

State                       : satisfied
Service Reference : No Services bound

How can a reference be satisfied if it’s not bound?

Guillaume Nodet
Red Hat, Open Source Integration

Email: gno...@redhat.com<mailto:gno...@redhat.com>
Web: http://fusesource.com<http://fusesource.com/>
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to