I disagree with the earlier statement that Blueprint and DS cannot coexist in the same bundle. I have thought quite hard about this and can think of no reason whatsoever why it should not work.
Tim Sent from my iPhone > On 3 Feb 2017, at 15:28, Christian Schneider <[email protected]> wrote: > > I fully agree. I never understood why this decision was made for config > admin. In newer versions of the spec it now is possible to share configs but > in practice I had lots of problems with it. Still sometimes a common service > can help. > > Christian > >> On 03.02.2017 16:13, Alex Soto wrote: >> No, services should be small and highly cohesive. Just because they need >> the same configuration setting, it does not mean they provide the same >> functionality or should be combined. This CM limitation is actually pushing >> for bigger less cohesive services. I am disappointed having invested in the >> CM for configuration, and it will cause me painful project delays now. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Alex soto >> [email protected] > > -- > Christian Schneider > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > Open Source Architect > http://www.talend.com >
