You can actually check the packages available with the packages:* commands.

bundle:headers also gives you details about the wiring.

Regards
JB

On 10/04/2017 07:54 PM, KARR, DAVID wrote:
What’s confusing about this is that those packages appear to be present, but perhaps they’re not being presented properly, and the requested version ranges are strange.

I find the quartz artifact in my .m2/repository, version 2.1.5 as specified in our properties files.  I also find the relevant Spring artifacts, but version 3.2.4.RELEASE (also as specified in properties). That version expression says that it is looking for a version less than 3.0.0.  I don’t understand why that is.

*From:* cschneider...@gmail.com [mailto:cschneider...@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of *Christian Schneider
*Sent:* Tuesday, October 03, 2017 10:15 PM
*To:* user@karaf.apache.org
*Subject:* Re: What kind of things would prevent a set of bundles from going 
Active?

For each bundle that can not be resolved diag shows the dependency tree of the requirement the resolver failed on.

Typically you look at the line at the bottom. This is what is really missing. In your case it means:

The package org.quartz.impl is missing.

The package org.springframework.xml.xpath with a version [2.0.0,3.0.0) ias 
missing.

The strings are in polish notation which make them unambiguous like David wrote but also hard to read if you are not used to it.

Christian

2017-10-03 1:37 GMT+02:00 KARR, DAVID <dk0...@att.com <mailto:dk0...@att.com>>:

     > -----Original Message-----
     > From: Jean-Baptiste Onofré [mailto:j...@nanthrax.net 
<mailto:j...@nanthrax.net>]
     > Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 10:49 PM
     > To: user@karaf.apache.org <mailto:user@karaf.apache.org>
     > Subject: Re: What kind of things would prevent a set of bundles from
     > going Active?
     >
     > Hi,
     >
     > When a bundle is resolved, it means that the constraints resolution is
     > OK.
     > Basically, Import packages & requirements are satisfied.
     >
     > So, a bundle stays in Installed state if it can go to Resolved due to a
     > unsatisfied resolution constraint (for instance an imported package is
     > not present).
     >
     > When a bundle is in Resolved state, it's possible to start it. Basically
     > it means calling the start method of the activator. If the start method
     > works and didn't throw an exception, then, the bundle becomes active.
     >
     > In the case of blueprint, the activator is managed by blueprint. Grace-
     > Period means that blueprint is looking for a dependency service at
     > startup and it doesn't find it. So, he's waiting for the service.
     >
     > bundle:diag or log gives you detail about the service not present.

    Thanks for the reply.  This is helping.

    Running "bundle:diag" did give me some useful output.  Running "log" just
    returned to the prompt.

    An excerpt from the "bundle:diag" output is here:
    ------------------
    apis-base (82)
    --------------
    Status: Installed
    Unsatisfied Requirements:
    [82.0] osgi.wiring.package; (&(osgi.wiring.package=org.apache.commons.io
    
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__org.apache.commons.io&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ywsgJ_pZLXX8vzZNai1vxoxc946N5Ls_M8h0G5a50rU&s=Sroqq0ikLqBCw2IqT1qc-ukvJqIodJsi3hH1qILBihM&e=>)(version>=1.4.0)(!(version>=2.0.0)))
    [82.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.quartz)
    [82.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.quartz.impl)

    onemap-impl (89)
    ----------------
    Status: Installed
    Unsatisfied Requirements:
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package;
    
(&(osgi.wiring.package=com.att.ecom.base.util)(version>=1.1.0)(!(version>=2.0.0)))
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package;
    (osgi.wiring.package=com.att.ecom.onemap.api.constants)
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package;
    (&(osgi.wiring.package=net.sf.ehcache)(version>=2.5.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package;
    
(&(osgi.wiring.package=net.sf.ehcache.config)(version>=2.5.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package;
    
(&(osgi.wiring.package=net.sf.ehcache.store)(version>=2.5.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package; (osgi.wiring.package=org.springframework.dao)
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package; 
(osgi.wiring.package=org.springframework.jdbc.core)
    [89.0] osgi.wiring.package;
    
(&(osgi.wiring.package=org.springframework.xml.xpath)(version>=2.0.0)(!(version>=3.0.0)))
    ------------------

    In the past, I've tried to find a guide for fully interpreting these error
    messages, but I've always ended up just blundering through it.  Is there a
    clear guide for how to interpret these somewhere?  I could guess that the
    first bundle needs commons-io and quartz, and the second needs ehcache, some
    spring artifacts, and a couple of application-specific artifacts, and I can
    interpret some of those version expressions, but I don't understand why it
    sometimes has the "&()" wrapper (is that always when there's a version
    expression?).

     > On 09/29/2017 07:30 PM, KARR, DAVID wrote:
     > > I'm still working with the legacy app using Karaf 3.0.1, which I don't
     > have very good overall documentation for.
     > >
     > > I've been able to execute my "feature:install" command in the karaf
     > console, which appeared to complete successfully, but at that point it's
     > apparently expected that all of my bundles are in an "Active" state.
     > However, for some reason most of them are not.  Some are, but some of
     > the application-specific bundles are "Installed", or even "Grace
     > Period".
     > >
     > > I've checked the karaf.log, and there are no obvious red flags.
     > >
     > > When I try to hit my REST service at localhost:8181, it just times
     > out, which is not surprising, as the bundle in question probably is not
     > active.
     > >
     > > I also tried installing the web console.  I just did "feature:install
     > webconsole" and then went to "http://localhost:8181/system/console"; in
     > my browser.  This timed out.
     > >
     > > What should I be looking at to diagnose this?
     > >
     >
     > --
     > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
     > jbono...@apache.org <mailto:jbono...@apache.org>
     > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
     > 3A__blog.nanthrax.net
    
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__3A-5F-5Fblog.nanthrax.net&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ywsgJ_pZLXX8vzZNai1vxoxc946N5Ls_M8h0G5a50rU&s=183dl-n0jyIayv3W4Sa0ZmQAds0rULtG_tfaAhBD9T0&e=>&d=DwIDaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-
     > xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ZMfiZcSDNceMx7Qo65Vgub5g4k_Jmwo5hPTCY33LQXA&s=jl9mLMBBmRS
     > FeUETzUN7l8dHAQbh5CGPlgZd6fqUSJI&e=
     > Talend - https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-
     > 3A__www.talend.com
    
<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__3A-5F-5Fwww.talend.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ywsgJ_pZLXX8vzZNai1vxoxc946N5Ls_M8h0G5a50rU&s=dFH73q3dy_AHWMrBmRmvPfa05oD5w6zCEzeYtClLSNw&e=>&d=DwIDaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-
     > xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ZMfiZcSDNceMx7Qo65Vgub5g4k_Jmwo5hPTCY33LQXA&s=ZcPGU_vMwhY
     > t2Zoc_2TdHZKrZ1Z-wyM2owPWlY6nFM0&e=



--

--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__owa.talend.com_owa_redir.aspx-3FC-3D3aa4083e0c744ae1ba52bd062c5a7e46-26URL-3Dhttp-253a-252f-252fwww.liquid-2Dreality.de&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ywsgJ_pZLXX8vzZNai1vxoxc946N5Ls_M8h0G5a50rU&s=XA1g_edbuF0uLDolXaY7sLvXsAufVqxXS4pXHBhIPX0&e=>

Computer Scientist

http://www.adobe.com <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.adobe.com&d=DwMFaQ&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OsTemSXEn-xy2uk0vYF_EA&m=ywsgJ_pZLXX8vzZNai1vxoxc946N5Ls_M8h0G5a50rU&s=j5d5pJJFEcyJY7GSdGav9yUx9tOTMdV2YMTi26h1J7o&e=>


--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to