Hi Scott, correct, config:update is propagated to cfg file (it's a fix I did on 4.0.x and 4.1.x). Let me check on 4.2.x.
Regards JB On 04/06/2018 05:30 PM, Leschke, Scott wrote: > I thought changes to a service configuration were propagated to the associated > .cfg file. The configuration changes have definitely taken place but I’m not > seeing the I’m not seeing the changes reflected in the .cfg. Was I mistaken? > This is on 4.2.0 M2 on Windows. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Scott > -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré jbono...@apache.org http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com