Hi Scott,

correct, config:update is propagated to cfg file (it's a fix I did on 4.0.x and
4.1.x). Let me check on 4.2.x.

Regards
JB

On 04/06/2018 05:30 PM, Leschke, Scott wrote:
> I thought changes to a service configuration were propagated to the associated
> .cfg file.  The configuration changes have definitely taken place but I’m not
> seeing the I’m not seeing the changes reflected in the .cfg.  Was I mistaken? 
> This is on 4.2.0 M2 on Windows.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> Scott
> 

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbono...@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Reply via email to