Please see the patch and my comment on KARAF-5764, I think we need more change to support java11 in KARAF.
As XBean also embed asm source, so we need a new XBean release which build against ASM6.2, as well as a new easymock release. Besides, Since JDK11, those modules get removed from JDK * java.corba — CORBA * java.transaction — The subset of the Java Transaction API defined by Java SE to support CORBA Object Transaction Services * java.activation — JavaBeans Activation Framework * java.xml.bind — Java Architecture for XML Binding (JAXB) * java.xml.ws — Java API for XML Web Services (JAX-WS), Web Services Metadata for the Java Platform, and SOAP with Attachments for Java (SAAJ) * java.xml.ws.annotation — The subset of the JSR-250 Common Annotations defined by Java SE to support web services So I think we don't need to use --patch-module for those APIs which already get removed. What we do is just use normal bundle for those APIs, or if we really need those API in boot stage we can put those in $KARAF_HOME/lib/boot folder, so far we need jaxb and activation in lib/boot/folder as features.core need those. [1]https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5764 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KARAF-5764> Cheers －－－－－－－－－－－－－ Freeman(Yue) Fang Red Hat, Inc. FuseSource is now part of Red Hat > On Jun 8, 2018, at 1:37 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Serge, > > I just submitted Aries Proxy Impl 1.1.2 with ASM 6.2 this morning, > bringing support of Java 9, 10, 11. > > As soon as the vote passed, I will update in Karaf. The purpose is to > include this for Karaf 4.2.1 (planned next week), in order to give us > time to test. > Before 4.2.1, I have also to work on Pax Web (7.1.1) supporting Jetty > 9.4.10 supporting new Java version as well. > > So, to summarize, 4.2.1 should support Java 10 & 11, thanks to the ASM > 6.2 update + Aries Proxy + Pax Web/Jetty update (all Jira are created > and in my bucket). > > Regards > JB > > On 07/06/2018 17:35, Serge Huber wrote: >> Hello, >> >> With the upcoming release of JDK 11 (planned for September), I was >> wondering what the plans for supporting it looked like ? Are we >> expecting any kind of blocking problems ? Should be simpler than JDK 9 I >> think. >> >> I didn't follow the JDK 10 support, did that involve any problems ? >> >> cheers, >> Serge... > > -- > Jean-Baptiste Onofré > [email protected] > http://blog.nanthrax.net > Talend - http://www.talend.com
