As I noted previously the OSGI CDI reference implementation is at Apache Aries and I believe differs significantly from Guillaume’s implementation in philosophy.
David Jencks Sent from my iPhone > On Nov 20, 2018, at 10:14 AM, Ranx <[email protected]> wrote: > > It appears that Fuse 7 is supporting PAX CDI and that changes my assessment > of all this. > > The OSGi Alliance has been positively glacial in approving the specification > (six years now) but that appears to be about to change. Hopefully they adopt > Guillaume's implementation as the reference standard and when the final spec > drops a few tweaks are made to PAX CDI for final. > > I'm not sure why it has taken so long and having CDI with DS for service > annotation while also being able to use the standard annotations for > internal bundle wiring is long past due. > > That Red Hat is supporting CDI means I don't have to worry about > recommending it to my clients. That it appears that the OSGi Alliance is > about to sign off on the standard is even more exciting. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-User-f930749.html
