Comparing features “framework" and "static-framework" I noticed that
"static-framework" feature does not add service mix activation API bundle,
while “framework” does.
<feature version="${project.version}" description="Karaf core feature"
name="framework" hidden="true">
<!-- persistent wiring extension -->
<bundle
start-level="1">mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/org.apache.karaf.features.extension/${project.version}</bundle>
<!-- mvn: and wrap: url handlers -->
<bundle
start-level="5">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.url/pax-url-aether/${pax.url.version}</bundle>
<!-- logging -->
<bundle
start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-api/${pax.logging.version}</bundle>
<bundle
start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-log4j2/${pax.logging.version}</bundle>
<bundle
start-level="8">mvn:org.fusesource.jansi/jansi/${jansi.version}</bundle>
<!-- config admin -->
<bundle
start-level="9">mvn:org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.coordinator/${felix.coordinator.version}</bundle>
<bundle
start-level="10">mvn:org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.configadmin/${felix.configadmin.version}</bundle>
<!-- file install -->
<bundle
start-level="11">mvn:org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.fileinstall/${felix.fileinstall.version}</bundle>
<!-- features service -->
<bundle
start-level="15">mvn:org.apache.karaf.features/org.apache.karaf.features.core/${project.version}</bundle>
<bundle dependency="true"
start-level="30">mvn:org.apache.servicemix.specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.jaxb-api-2.2/${servicemix-spec.version}</bundle>
<bundle dependency="true"
start-level="30">mvn:org.apache.servicemix.specs/org.apache.servicemix.specs.activation-api-1.1/${servicemix-spec.version}</bundle>
</feature>
<feature version="${project.version}" description="Karaf core feature"
name="static-framework">
<!-- logging -->
<bundle start="true"
start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-api/${pax.logging.version}</bundle>
<bundle start="true"
start-level="8">mvn:org.ops4j.pax.logging/pax-logging-log4j2/${pax.logging.version}</bundle>
<bundle start="true"
start-level="8">mvn:org.fusesource.jansi/jansi/${jansi.version}</bundle>
<!-- static config admin -->
<bundle start="true"
start-level="10">mvn:org.apache.karaf.services/org.apache.karaf.services.staticcm/${project.version}</bundle>
</feature>
Could this be a bug? Should “static-framework” also add Activation API bundle?
Best regards,
Alex soto
> On Sep 9, 2019, at 3:40 PM, Alex Soto <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Oracle’s JDK 1.8 Java 8 Update 171
>
> Best regards,
> Alex soto
>
>
>
>
>> On Sep 9, 2019, at 3:34 PM, Francois Papon <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Alex,
>>
>> Wich JDK are you using when building the custom distribution?
>>
>> regards,
>>
>> François
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> Le 09/09/2019 à 19:05, Alex Soto a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am trying to build a custom distribution using karaf-maven-plugin with
>>> Karaf version 4.2.6. To keep it to a minus, I have removed my feature,
>>> leaving only the following:
>>>
>>> <startupFeatures>
>>> <feature>static-framework</feature>
>>> </startupFeatures>
>>> <javase>1.8</javase>
>>> <framework>static</framework>
>>> <useReferenceUrls>true</useReferenceUrls>
>>> <environment>static</environment>
>>>
>>> Still, I get the following error:
>>>
>>> Unable to build assembly: Unable to resolve root: missing requirement
>>> [root] osgi.identity; osgi.identity=static-framework; type=karaf.feature;
>>> version=4.2.6;
>>> filter:="(&(osgi.identity=static-framework)(type=karaf.feature)(version>=4.2.6))"
>>> [caused by: Unable to resolve static-framework/4.2.6: missing requirement
>>> [static-framework/4.2.6] osgi.identity;
>>> osgi.identity=org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-log4j2; type=osgi.bundle;
>>> version="[1.10.2,1.10.2]"; resolution:=mandatory [caused by: Unable to
>>> resolve org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-log4j2/1.10.2: missing
>>> requirement [org.ops4j.pax.logging.pax-logging-log4j2/1.10.2]
>>> osgi.wiring.package; filter:="(osgi.wiring.package=javax.activation)”]]
>>>
>>>
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Alex soto
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
