Agree about the optional, but it could head to a refresh, so I would like to check.
I keep you posted. Regards JB On 04/10/2019 11:38, J. Brebec wrote: > Pax Logging using Knopflerfish is not new, however the jar is required only > since v1.11 of pax logging (it has been introduced in PAXLOGGING-252). The > jar is not needed at runtime, because it's embedded into pax-logging. > > In my opinion, the dependency should be marked as optional in the pom of > pax-logging-service. Having a required dependency present only in a private > maven repository cn be easily a bad experience for people like me behind a > corporate proxy. > > Do you know how to get ride of the println of the wrapper bundle ? This > bundle is started before pax-logging and the default logger use > System.println. It happens in custom distribution or when using the static > framework. > > Regards, > Jérémie > > On 2019/10/04 08:23:28, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> knoperfish dependency is in pax-logging-api and it's not new. >> >> The karaf-docker-example creates a distribution without problem because >> I have the artifacts on my repo. >> >> The knopflerfish artifacts are not on Central anymore but on repo: >> >> https://www.knopflerfish.org/releases/5.0.0/maven2/ >> >> If you add an exclusion in pom dependency it should work. >> >> I have two proposals here: >> >> 1. remove the dependency in pax-logging (but it could impact some users) >> 2. add the bundle as "installed" to populate karaf system folder and not >> go on remote repositories. >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On 04/10/2019 10:03, J. Brebec wrote: >>> Do you remember the name of the property or where I should look ? I didn't >>> see anything on this suject in the release note of pax logging. >>> >>> Thanks >>> >>> On 2019/10/03 18:01:24, Benjamin Graf <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> If I remember right there is a new option to be set since pax-logging 1.11. >>>> >>>> Might not be set yet in Karaf 4.2.7 >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Benjamin >>>> >>>> Am 3. Oktober 2019 13:59:01 MESZ schrieb "J. Brebec" >>>> <[email protected]>: >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> It's probably related to the upgrade to pax-logging too, but when I >>>>> launch Karaf 4.2.7 (on windows), there is a System.println visibile in >>>>> the console : >>>>> >>>>> org.ops4j.pax.url.wrap >>>>> [org.ops4j.pax.url.commons.handler.HandlerActivator] DEBUG : Handler >>>>> for protocols [wrap] started >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2019/10/03 09:10:43, jbonofre <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Let me take a look. It's probably a side effect of pax-logging 1.11 >>>>> update. >>>>>> >>>>>> I keep you posted. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> JB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Sent from: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-User-f930749.html >>>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet. >> >> -- >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> [email protected] >> http://blog.nanthrax.net >> Talend - http://www.talend.com >> -- Jean-Baptiste Onofré [email protected] http://blog.nanthrax.net Talend - http://www.talend.com
