Thanks for the update. I will investigate tomorrow. I will keep you posted. 

Regards 
JB

Le mar. 18 f?vr. 2020 ? 17:01, Erwin Hogeweg <erwin.hoge...@me.com> a ?crit :
Lukas,

I believe I have some success by copying configuration from my env. to the prehook test.

2020-02-18T10:35:05,924 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | PreHookTest                      | 50 - prehook - 1.0.0.SNAPSHOT | Starting PreHookTest ...
2020-02-18T10:35:05,928 | WARN  | activator-1-thread-1 | SshUtils                         | 38 - org.apache.karaf.shell.ssh - 4.2.8 | Configured cipher 'aes256-ctr' not available
2020-02-18T10:35:05,931 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | ServiceTrackerHelper             | 16 - org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config - 1.4.4 | Obtained service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.osgi.service.jdbc.DataSourceFactory)(osgi.jdbc.driver.name=sqlite))
2020-02-18T10:35:05,931 | WARN  | activator-1-thread-1 | SshUtils                         | 38 - org.apache.karaf.shell.ssh - 4.2.8 | Configured cipher 'aes192-ctr' not available
2020-02-18T10:35:05,932 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | DataSourceRegistration           | 16 - org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config - 1.4.4 | Found DataSourceFactory. Creating DataSource prehook-test
2020-02-18T10:35:05,953 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | DataSourceRegistration           | 16 - org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config - 1.4.4 | Executing pre hook for DataSource prehook-test
2020-02-18T10:35:05,953 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | PreHookTest                      | 50 - prehook - 1.0.0.SNAPSHOT | Called PreHookTest.prepare() ?

I reduced the maven-bundle-plugin to:

  <groupId>org.apache.felix</groupId>
    <artifactId>maven-bundle-plugin</artifactId>
    <extensions>true</extensions>
    <configuration>
      <!-- Do not generate that OBR file in the local maven cache -->
      <obrRepository>NONE</obrRepository>
      <instructions>
        <_nouses>true</_nouses>
        <Bundle-SymbolicName>${project.artifactId}</Bundle-SymbolicName>
      </instructions>
    </configuration>

And I changed the component annotations to:

  @Component(
    // scope = ServiceScope.SINGLETON,
    immediate = true,
    // service = PreHook.class,
    property = "name=prehook-test-hook"
)
public class PreHookTest implements PreHook {
?

I may have thrown away too much, but at least this is a good starting point.


Erwin


On Feb 17, 2020, at 13:55, Erwin Hogeweg <erwin.hoge...@me.com> wrote:

Lukas,

I am currently on the road but I will try this ASAP. 

Kind Regards,

Erwin

El feb. 17, 2020, a la(s) 08:55, Roedl Lukas <lukas.ro...@ait.ac.at> escribi?:

?
Hi,
 
We?ve similar problems with a Pax JDBC Pre Hook getting called.
I?ve prepared a minimal example on https://github.com/roedll/pax-jdbc-pre-hook-test using SQLite to make it a bit more concrete.
Apache Karaf 4.2.8 in combination with Pax JDBC 1.4.4 is used.
 
The DataSource is specified in the file ?org.ops4j.datasource-prehook-test.cfg? (see [1]) and without a PreHook defined the DataSource is published as expected:
 
dataSourceName = prehook-test
felix.fileinstall.filename = file:/X:/pax-jdbc-pre-hook-test/framework/target/assembly/etc/org.ops4j.datasource-prehook-test.cfg
objectClass = [javax.sql.DataSource]
osgi.jdbc.driver.name = sqlite
osgi.jndi.service.name = prehook-test
pax.jdbc.managed = true
service.bundleid = 16
service.factoryPid = org.ops4j.datasource
service.pid = org.ops4j.datasource.5a7b2e4b-4781-4b60-b707-74a48e210bda
service.scope = singleton
url = "">
 
With the PreHook specified (like ?ops4j.preHook=prehook-test-hook?) the last log entry is ?Waiting for service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.hook.PreHook)(name=prehook-test-hook))? event if the PreHook itself is started and active:
 
Pax JDBC - Test - PreHook (21) provides:
----------------------------------------
component.name = at.roedll.pax.jdbc.pre.hook.test.PreHookTest
name = prehook-test-hook
objectClass = [org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.hook.PreHook]
service.bundleid = 21
service.scope = bundle
 
 
Can someone which doesn?t have problems with this, please take a short look, if there are some differences between the working configurations and this example?
 
Best,
Lukas
 
 
 
Von: Erwin Hogeweg <erwin.hoge...@me.com
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Januar 2020 22:40
An: user@karaf.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Karaf 4.2.8-SNAPSHOT - pax-jdbc 1.4.4 - prehook not working
 
Hi Alex,
 
Below a similar sequence from my log.
 
From your log it seems that the Derby DataSourceFactory is not resolved. I remember that at some point I changed the driver.name entry in the config to a driver.class entry. That is for a mySQL database though but but maybe?
 
Another silly question: Is your datasource functional if you leave out the preHook?
 
Obtained service dependency: (objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.ConfigLoader)
Waiting for service dependency: (objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.ConfigLoader)
Waiting for service dependency: (&(pool=*)(!(pax.jdbc.managed=true))(|(objectClass=javax.sql.DataSource)(objectClass=javax.sql.XADataSource)))
Waiting for service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.pool.common.PooledDataSourceFactory)(pool=dbcp2)(xa=false))
Waiting for service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.pool.common.PooledDataSourceFactory)(pool=dbcp2)(xa=false))
Obtained service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.pool.common.PooledDataSourceFactory)(pool=dbcp2)(xa=false))
Obtained service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.hook.PreHook)(name=seegate))
Obtained service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.osgi.service.jdbc.DataSourceFactory)(osgi.jdbc.driver.class=com.mysql.jdbc.Driver))
 
 
Cheers, 
Erwin


On Jan 23, 2020, at 13:22, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> wrote:
 
Yes,  the migration service is being registered:
 
 
Obtained service dependency: (objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.ConfigLoader)
Waiting for service dependency: (objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.ConfigLoader)
Waiting for service dependency: (&(pool=*)(!(pax.jdbc.managed=true))(|(objectClass=javax.sql.DataSource)(objectClass=javax.sql.XADataSource)))
Obtained service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.hook.PreHook)(name=querierDB))
Waiting for service dependency: (&(objectClass=org.osgi.service.jdbc.DataSourceFactory)(osgi.jdbc.driver.name=derby))
 
 
And
 
service:list org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.hook.PreHook
[org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.hook.PreHook]
---------------------------------
 component.id = 29
 component.name = org.enquery.encryptedquery.querier.data.maint.Migration
 name = querierDB
 service.bundleid = 35
 service.id = 276
 service.scope = bundle
Provided by : 
 EncryptedQuery :: Querier :: Data (35)
Used by: 
 OPS4J Pax JDBC Config (210)
 

Best regards,
Alex soto




On Jan 22, 2020, at 1:06 PM, Erwin Hogeweg <erwin.hoge...@me.com> wrote:
 
Just this week I upgraded from karaf-1.2.6 and pax-jdbc-1.3.1 to karaf-1.2.8-SNAPSHOT and pax-jdbc-1.4.4 and I didn?t run into any issues.
 
Stupid question, but can you confirm that the Migrator class is instantiated and that the component is active?
 
               com.*.Migrator in bundle 129 (db.init:1.0.0.SNAPSHOT_20200122-1230) enabled, 1 instance.
                   Id: 18, State:ACTIVE

Initially I missed some Package-Imports on the migrator bundle which left the component in the SATISFIED (I believe) state. After scrolling through the logs I discovered a CNFE which pointed me in the right direction.
 
Erwin
 


On Jan 22, 2020, at 12:53, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> wrote:
 
I tested with Karaf 4.2.7 and various versions of Pax-JDBC.
The hook is not being called stating with Pax-JDBC 1.3.4.
 
Something must have changed in Pax-JDBC 1.3.4 as everything else remains the same in my tests.  
 
 

Best regards,
Alex soto




On Jan 22, 2020, at 12:39 PM, Erwin Hogeweg <erwin.hoge...@me.com> wrote:
 
Ignore the different datasource names. I messed up the ?replace all? :-)


On Jan 22, 2020, at 12:36, Erwin Hogeweg <erwin.hoge...@me.com> wrote:
 
It seems to work for me with Karaf-4.2.8-SNAPSHOT and pax-jdbc-1.4.4.
 
 12 ? Active   ?  80 ? 1.4.4                        ? OPS4J Pax JDBC Generic Driver Extender
 13 ? Active   ?  80 ? 1.4.4                        ? OPS4J Pax JDBC Config
 14 ? Active   ?  80 ? 1.4.4                        ? OPS4J Pax JDBC Pooling Support Base
 
[features-2-thread-1] INFO org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.impl.DataSourceRegistration - Found DataSourceFactory. Creating DataSource jdbc/mydatasource
[features-2-thread-1] INFO org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.impl.DataSourceRegistration - Executing pre hook for DataSource jdbc/mydatasource
INFO 1/22/20 12:32 PM: liquibase: Successfully acquired change log lock
INFO 1/22/20 12:32 PM: liquibase: Reading from seegate.DATABASECHANGELOG
INFO 1/22/20 12:32 PM: liquibase: Successfully released change log lock
[features-2-thread-1] INFO org.ops4j.pax.jdbc.config.impl.DataSourceRegistration - Pre hook finished. Publishing DataSource jdbc/mydatasource
[features-2-thread-1] INFO org.apache.aries.jpa.container.impl.DataSourceTracker - Found DataSource for seegate.pu osgi:service/javax.sql.DataSource/(osgi.jndi.service.name=jdbc/mydatasource)

FWIW - I did change the exception handling in Migrator to better see when/if the migration fails:
 
    @Override
    public void prepare(DataSource dsthrowsSQLException {
        try (Connection connection =ds.getConnection()) {
            prepare(connection);
        } catch (LiquibaseException e) {
                    LOG.error(e.getClass().getName() + ": " + e.getMessage());
//            throw new RuntimeException(e);
        }
    }
 
 
Cheers,
 
Erwin


On Jan 22, 2020, at 11:11, Alex Soto <alex.s...@envieta.com> wrote:
 
Same is happening to me, it works with Pax-JDBC 1.3.0, but not with Pax-JDBC 1.4.0, which is the one included in Karaf 4.2.7.
 

Best regards,
Alex soto




On Jan 20, 2020, at 9:10 AM, stefang <stefan.gue...@me.com> wrote:
 
Hi,

we are not able to run Christian's Example:

https://github.com/cschneider/Karaf-Tutorial/blob/master/liquibase/service/src/main/java/net/lr/tutorial/db/service/Migrator.java


Must be something todo with pax-jdbc 1.4.4 (wich comes with 4.2.8)

Karaf 4.2.6 (pax-jdbc 1.3.5)works fine.

Stefan





--
Sent from: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Karaf-User-f930749.html

Reply via email to