Thank you!

На нд, 16.05.2021 г. в 8:11 ч. Jean-Baptiste Onofre <[email protected]>
написа:

> Hi Vassil,
>
> JVM/OSGi spec versions are listed here:
> http://karaf.apache.org/download.html
>
> Each Karaf branch supports specific OSGi spec.
>
> For instance, you can see that Karaf 4.3.x is OSGi R7 (providing
> corresponding Felix and Equinox framework).
>
> FYI, the wiki content is deprecated and you should use the documentation (
> http://karaf.apache.org/manual/latest/).
>
> You can change the framework using karaf.framework property in
> etc/config.properties.
> FYI, config.properties is loaded by Karaf Main (including jre.properties
> and custom.properties).
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> Le 15 mai 2021 à 20:18, Васил Зорев <[email protected]> a écrit :
>
> Hello,
>
> I know this is probably one of the first questions that comes to a Karaf
> user, but still:
>
> Where is defined the Felix framework version that a Karaf installation
> uses?
>
> 0 | Active   |   0 | 6.0.4              | System Bundle
>
>   | org.apache.felix.framework
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KARAF/How+do+I+choose+between+Felix+and+Equinox
> Based on this Wiki, I found it in etc/config.properties.
>
>
> karaf.framework.felix=mvn\:org.apache.felix/org.apache.felix.framework/6.0.4
> Is this how the felix version can be changed ? Can it be changed at all ?
>
> Also a question on OSGi versions and their backward compatibility. How is
> the OSGi version related to the Felix (or Equinox) version? In the same
> config file I found for example:
>
> org.osgi.framework.system.packages= \
>  ...
>  org.osgi.framework;version="1.9",\
>
> Does this affect some manifest header or? I am only familiar with major
> OSGi specification versions - 4,6,7 etc. don't know what 1.9 refers to. Can
> the Karaf OSGi version be changed (for example to another major release - 4
> or 6) or is it fixed and not backward-compatible?
>
> Sorry for the many questions. If there is documentation regarding this
> please relate it, I will gladly read it myself.
>
> Regards,
> Vassil
>
>
>

Reply via email to