Am 24.05.2021 um 18:25 schrieb Steven Huypens:
Hi Daniel,
If that's clearly stated, I'll try to have our version numbers
changed. Can you tell me where to find this statement ? I did try to
look for it myself, but couldn't find it.
Hi Steven,
Good that you insisted me to double-check - I was wrong! I was mixing
that up with a different version specification where leading zeros where
not allowed, but I indeed couldn't find concrete evidence for leading
zeros being invalid in OSGi version.
I apologize for the misleading comment and false statement,
- Daniel
Best regards,
Steven
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 5:16 PM Daniel Krügler <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Am 24.05.2021 um 17:10 schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofre:
> Hi Steven,
>
> Yeah, the state should already contain the "cleaned" versions.
>
> I will take a look.
>
> Anyway, as best practice, I would avoid leading 0 ;)
I completely agree and I don't understand why there should be
additional
work invested to "fix" that. The OSGi specification is clear that any
leading zeros in version numbers are invalid. Anyone attempting to
provide such a bundle should correct the version number and remove the
leading zeros.
- Daniel
