I know the last email was long so wanted to boil down the question:

Does the change from KNOX-690 make sense since it changes the URL meaning?
Maybe there is a way to do template matching without modifying the URL that
gets passed to the backend?

Kevin Risden

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Kevin Risden <compuwizard...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Sorry for the long email but hopefully it provides enough detail to
> understand the problem and if there is anything we can do to work around it
> differently.
>
>
> *Problem*
>
>
>
> With Knox 0.6.x (HDP 2.3), the Knox WebHBase call returns results
> correctly. With Knox 0.9.x (HDP 2.5), the Knox WebHBase call returns a 404
> not found. If we hit WebHBase directly then there is no issue.
>
>
>
> An example call:
>
>
>
> curl -i -k -u USER 'https://HOST:8443/gateway/TOPOLOGY/hbase/ns:table/%
> 2frkpart1%2frkpart2'
>
>
>
> *Analysis*
>
>
>
> Looked closer at gateway-audit and noticed the dispatch urls were being
> encoded differently between the two versions.
>
>
>
> Works – Knox 0.6.x (HDP 2.3)
>
>
>
> 17/05/23 16:54:13 ||7c4131fc-8638-4a1a-9228-d9a67a312a40|audit|WEBHBASE|
> USER|||dispatch|uri|http://HOST:8084/ns:table/%2frkpart1%
> 2frkpart2?doAs=USER|success|Response
> <http://HOST:8084/ns:table/%2frkpart1%2frkpart2?doAs=USER%7Csuccess%7CResponse>
> status: 200
>
>
>
> Doesn’t work – Knox 0.9.x (HDP 2.5)
>
>
>
> 17/05/23 17:23:13 ||4244f242-6694-40bb-914d-8dc7e222f074|audit|WEBHBASE|
> USER|||dispatch|uri|http://HOST:8084/ns%3Atable/rkpart1/
> rkpart2?doAs=USER|success|Response
> <http://HOST:8084/ns%3Atable/rkpart1/rkpart2?doAs=USER%7Csuccess%7CResponse>
> status: 404
>
>
>
> The 404 is coming from WebHBase directly not being able to find the split
> row key with the extra slash. The difference is that the %2f which is a /
> is being decoded and then removed instead of being left as a %2f in the
> URL. This changes the meaning of the url and causes issues for WebHBase on
> the backend.
>
>
>
> At first the culprit seemed like https://issues.apache.org/
> jira/browse/KNOX-709, but this wasn’t the case. Looks like KNOX-709 may
> have been caused by KNOX-690.
>
>
>
> I pulled down a few Knox versions 0.8.0 and 0.9.0 and found that it did
> not affect 0.8.0. I pulled down the code from https://github.com/
> hortonworks/knox-release/tree/HDP-2.5.3.77-tag and did a git bisect to
> find the offending commit using this test case: https://gist.github.com/
> risdenk/afecc66d6fc0c9d665abd1ae5466f341. The commit is
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=knox.git;h=c28224c and related
> JIRA is https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KNOX-690.
>
>
>
> *Resolution*
>
>
>
> I rebuilt Knox from https://github.com/hortonworks/knox-release/tree/
> HDP-2.5.3.77-tag with the commit c28224c for that reverted. The adjusted
> code is here: https://github.com/risdenk/knox-release/tree/hdp25_
> revert_KNOX-690. The change is only a single commit
> https://github.com/risdenk/knox-release/commit/
> dc452126de99f6f1d15938f7294e95e3b7c89328
>
>
>
> I rebuilt Knox with mvn -DskipTests package and copied the two affected
> jars (gateway-provider-rewrite and gateway-util-urltemplate) to
> /usr/hdp/current/knox-server/lib/
>
>
>
> I moved the two old jars to /root. The affected jars were
>
> ·         gateway-provider-rewrite-0.9.0.2.5.3.0-37.jar
>
> ·         gateway-util-urltemplate-0.9.0.2.5.3.0-37.jar
>
>
>
> I then restarted Knox on hdpr05en02. This made the following curl call
> work:
>
>
>
> curl -i -k -u USER 'https://KNOXHOST:8443/gateway/TOPOLOGY/hbase/ns:
> table/%2frkpart1%2frkpart2'
>
>
>
> *Conclusion*
>
>
> I'm not convinced that KNOX-690 is a good idea but it basically made it so
> url encoded paths were checked by the templates/parser. URL encoding should
> be left alone in many cases. Reverting the change from KNOX-690 shouldn't
> affect us much more other than upgrades to HDP could break this. I think we
> should really avoid using url encodable characters in the rowkey especially
> for webhbase. / is a bad character to try to pass through webservices.
> Since having the customer change rowkey design will be painful, we will be
> using a workaround in the short term.
>
> Kevin Risden
>

Reply via email to