Hi Zhike, Typically when running software like Kudu in containers, the data volumes would be bind-mounted, not using aufs or overlayfs, etc. So, there should be no measurable overhead.
-Todd On Sun, Feb 16, 2020 at 7:21 PM Zhike Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am going to deploy a kudu cluster in a production environment. I found > out > that there are no binary builds of kudu; it can only build from source or > use > the experimental docker image. Considering build from source and then > install it > natively take a lot of time, I am wondering it is a good idea to dockerize > kudu. > The problem I concern about dockerizing kudu is storage performance loss. I > found out this Docker storage driver benchmarks (last updated October 2017) > https://github.com/chriskuehl/docker-storage-benchmark > > Best regards, > Kyle Zhike Chen > -- Todd Lipcon Software Engineer, Cloudera
