Yes, I'm using lz4.

On Tue, Aug 8, 2017 at 4:15 AM, ShaoFeng Shi <shaofeng...@apache.org> wrote:

> Thanks for the input. Did you enable any compression (e.g, LZO,
> Snappy) for HBase?
>
> 2017-08-08 0:49 GMT+08:00 Alexander Sterligov <sterligo...@joom.it>:
>
>> All parameters were default. I've found out that it is really related to
>> size estimation of count distinct measure. F2 family were underestimated
>> for about 4 times.
>>
>> After I set kylin.cube.size-estimate-countdistinct-ratio=0.2 estimations
>> are good and it works much better.
>>
>> It looks like default value of 0.05 is too low for bitmap and global
>> dictionary.
>>
>> Cube description is attached.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 7, 2017 at 6:21 AM, ShaoFeng Shi <shaofeng...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Alexander,
>>>
>>> Sometimes there will be over-estimation for the size if Cube has some
>>> complex measure like count distinct and topn, but seldom heard of less
>>> estimation. Did you change other parameters which may impact on the
>>> estimation in kylin.properties? Besides, if you can share the Cube
>>> definition, that would help (information like dimension/measure, rowkey
>>> encoding will also impact on the region split).
>>>
>>> 2017-08-07 3:03 GMT+08:00 Alexander Sterligov <sterligo...@joom.it>:
>>>
>>>> I've found out that sharding is done manually, so running split in
>>>> hbase shell breaks data.
>>>>
>>>> So the main problem is that region-cut doesn't work on hbase with s3. I
>>>> see that in the log it creates shards properly:
>>>>
>>>> 2017-08-05 20:54:48,709 INFO  [Job 
>>>> 1175d3ed-504f-4eb0-a973-d57338fdff2c-892]
>>>> steps.CreateHTableJob:192 : Total size 21334.075368547456M (estimated)
>>>> 2017-08-05 20:54:48,709 INFO  [Job 
>>>> 1175d3ed-504f-4eb0-a973-d57338fdff2c-892]
>>>> steps.CreateHTableJob:193 : Expecting 4 regions.
>>>> 2017-08-05 20:54:48,709 INFO  [Job 
>>>> 1175d3ed-504f-4eb0-a973-d57338fdff2c-892]
>>>> steps.CreateHTableJob:194 : Expecting 5333 MB per region.
>>>>
>>>> But then I get single 20GB region.
>>>>
>>>> Did anyone had same behaviour?
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 8:15 PM, Alexander Sterligov <
>>>> sterligo...@joom.it> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I noticed very large hbase region for one segment (more than 20GB and
>>>>> kylin.storage.hbase.region-cut-gb=5). I don't know why it is so
>>>>> large, but anyway it degraded performance a lot, so I decided to split it
>>>>> in hbase.
>>>>>
>>>>> When the split has just started kylin started to return empty results
>>>>> for queries to this segment.
>>>>>
>>>>> Why can that happen?
>>>>>
>>>>> PS
>>>>> It seams to me that kylin.storage.hbase.region-cut-gb doesn't work in
>>>>> case if external hbase cluster is used.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
> Shaofeng Shi 史少锋
>
>

Reply via email to