Thorsten Scherler wrote:
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 16:05 +0200, Andreas Hartmann wrote:
simon litwan wrote:
hi list
i'm working on a customers request about losing jobs after paste/rename
url. they wish the scheduled jobs should move with document. but they
also would be satisfied with a warning on the paste/rename screen that
the jobs will get lost.
[...]
That's a good example for a problem caused by mixing concerns -
document storage and site structure. If they were separated, the
problem would not occur. I suggest that we reconsider storing documents
in a non-structured way and implement site structures as views on the
document repository.
Like I understand the problem: simon wants to move the documents and it
would be best that the associated jobs as well would be moved, right?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=103992708800001&r=1&w=2
When linking the docs in jobs.xml with input modules then that is
possible.
The key is - as Michi pointed out - a facility to map unique, constant
IDs to documents. Unless we have that, we'd have to add a job-moving
functionality to the scheduler, which is IMO overkill. Re-writing the
URLs in jobs.xml directly violates the job store encapsulation.
I'm -1 to change the current behaviour in 1.2 (unless someone wants to
extend the scheduler), maybe we can add a message like
"Please check the subtree for scheduled jobs as they will get
lost after moving."
-- Andreas
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
