As I understand it, cinclude gives you caching and the ability to use
Cocoon-specific schemes
(cocoon:/, cocoon://, etc.). And I thought you could XPath selections
too.
Steve
On 12 Feb 2006, at 15:37, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote:
hi everyone!
is there any reason to use cinclude instead of xinclude (which
looks more flexible to me, since it allows xpointer selections)?
tia,
jörn
--
"Open source takes the bullshit out of software."
- Charles Ferguson on TechnologyReview.com
--
Jörn Nettingsmeier, EDV-Administrator
Institut für Politikwissenschaft
Universität Duisburg-Essen, Standort Duisburg
Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Telefon: 0203/379-2736
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
