You can thank Bob for his suggestion :-)

On 4/18/06, Gav.... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, 18 April 2006 7:39 PM
> > To: [email protected]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: Comments in HTML output files
> >
> > Gav,
> >
> > Actually, what you're doing is exactly what I'm doing as well. What
> > works is to embed the SSI include statement within a <xsl:comment/>
> > element in the xsl stylesheet. Your include statement would then look
> > like the following:
> >
> > <xsl:include>#include virtual="/page.inc"</xsl:comment>
> >
> > When the page gets parsed the <xsl:comment/> outputs the <!-- --> symbols.
> >
> > RAGill
>
> Doh!, how easy is that. Thanks :)
>
> Gav...
>
> >
> > On 4/17/06, Gav.... <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Stephen Blass [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, 18 April 2006 1:17 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: RE: Comments in HTML output files
> > > >
> > > > Give up the comments... Or change the entity mapping.
> > >
> > > There is also an issue at Forrest regarding the use
> > > Of includes.
> > >
> > > e.g.
> > >
> > > <!--#include virtual="/page.inc" -->
> > >
> > > This of course, gets ignored thinking it is a comment
> > > When it is not.
> > >
> > > Any ideas on this one, I was thinking adding an 'if'
> > > Statement where appropriate to allow this sort
> > > Of thing through ?
> > >
> > > Gav...
> > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Richard Gill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 10:15 AM
> > > > To: [email protected]
> > > > Subject: Comments in HTML output files
> > > >
> > > > I need to include comment "<!-- -->" sections inside of static html
> > > > documents that are generated by Lenya. The problem is that if I create
> > a
> > > > <![CDATA[ ]]> section, <xsl:value-of ....>, or <xsl:text... in the xsl
> > > > file to output the <> chars, the entity &lt; or &gt; is subsitutted
> > > > instead. Does anyone have any ideas of how I can preserve the < and >
> > > > symbols in the transformation?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For
> > additional
> > > > commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > > > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.2/314 - Release Date:
> > 16/04/2006
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > No virus found in this incoming message.
> > Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> > Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.4.3/316 - Release Date: 17/04/2006
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to