IMO, we can make use of the give-and-take of these editors. Cheng
2009/4/30 Rudolf Korhummel <rud...@korhummel.de> > > Hi everyone, > > > > this question has been raised in a thread on the dev list, but IMO it's > > important enough to be discussed in a separate thread on the user list. > > > > I hope we all agree on these facts: > > > > * We need a 2.0.3 release asap. > > * The Kupu integration has serious issues which can't be resolved > quickly. > > * We shouldn't neglect the IE users. > > > > So, assuming that neither delaying the release nor fixing the Kupu > > integration are valid options, which course of action should we take? > > Some suggestions (not mutually exclusive): > > > I think having a document describing the editors situation for new users > would be import. > > > > 1. Just release, add the known issues to the release notes. > This may be be a frustrating experience for new users, because some will > try before they read the documentation (-0) > > 2. Move Kupu to the contributions area, release without Kupu. > > 3. Move Kupu to the last position in the "Edit" menu. > 2 or 3 is ok from MPOV. 3 maybe better, because we still have Kupu users. > > 4. Promote FCKEditor (menu item with link to the install instructions) > > 5. Promote TinyMCE (menu item with link to the install instructions) > > I've no experiences with this editors, because we use custom tags and the > xml validation was importend for us. But we can add the experiences from > other users to the documentation. > > > 6. .... > > > Rudolf > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@lenya.apache.org > >
