I agree. I use TinyMCE and the source editor, because I got them to work reasonably well -- not perfectly though.
Personally, I don't really care which editor is used, as long as it works well. The big challenge IMO is to stay reasonably up-to-date with it; browser updates tend to break dynamic user interfaces, which means that a few-years-old editor will very likely have a number of blocker-level issues when used with current-generation browsers. TinyMCE as it is is just barely good enough; UI- and feature-wise it's fine, it just has occasional hiccups, and I've had to disable some features to stop users from mangling the pages. But if there's a better alternative out there, I would have no objections to switching. I would much prefer a simple editor with stripped-down functionality that's solid as a rock to one that's more feature-rich but a little bit flaky. I know this isn't easy; even Google has trouble getting the Blogger editor to work decently even on their own browser, and they certainly don't want for resources. /Petteri On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Richard Frovarp <rfrov...@apache.org> wrote: > We support way too many editors, making it difficult for a new person to get > up and running quickly. I think we need to support one or two editors really > well. We can certainly support more. > > What editor do you use? What editor do you think needs better support? > > Richard > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@lenya.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscr...@lenya.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: user-h...@lenya.apache.org
