On 8/1/07, Björn Granvik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > It sounds a bit like a poor-man's-meta model. Or am I barking up the > wrong node tree here? :-)
Ah, yes, good call. The subreference nodes could sometimes be grouping nodes by type. My example certainly implied so. And in those situations it's a poor man's meta model. But that is definitely not always the case: you can group nodes by a lot of other things. So the subreference design pattern has value even when we have a meta model. And conversely, the meta model will provide a lot of value other than handing out references to all nodes of a certain type. But more about a meta model for Neo later... Cheers, -- Emil Eifrém, CEO [EMAIL PROTECTED] Neo Persistence AB, www.neopersistence.com Cell: +46 733 462 271 | US Cell: 206 403 8808 _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] http://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
