#12: finnish() is superflouse.
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Reporter: anonymous | Owner: emil
Type: bug report | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: neo-1.0
Component: neo-core api | Resolution:
Keywords: |
--------------------------+-------------------------------------------------
Comment (by emil):
Replying to [comment:2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> I agree once I have seen your rationale, and example.
>
> I might be to caught up in my SQL-thinking.
I think it's more a problem of poor documentation and rationale on our
end. So thanks for the feedback!
>
> But then, is not failure() redundant?
No. Neo's transaction manager does not support nested transactions (it is
optional in the JTA spec). So you might have a scenario where you invoke a
method that succeeds, thus marking the transaction successful, but after
that you detect an error. Then you must manually mark the tx as failed in
the outer scope.
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.neo4j.org/ticket/12#comment:3>
neo4j.org <http://trac.neo4j.org/>
The Neo4J.org Issue Tracker
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
