2008/5/11 Philip Jägenstedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 5/11/08, Mattias Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Allright, I'm pretty sure that it's all about the usage of >> tx.failure() (which is very seldom needed btw). In the first code >> snippet you call tx.failure() inside the for-loop and continues. > > No, I throw an Exception. updateWikipediaBlurb() isn't failing, it's > the musicbrainz webservice that fails with a WebServiceException. > After throwing a ServletException the finally block with tx.finish() > ought to be run, after which the webserver returns HTTP 500 or > similar. Well, somewhere inside that for-loop is a tx.failure(); followed by a continue; statement. I was refering to that piece of code. > >> LuceneIndexService seems to ignore that fact. Then you continue to > > But I'm using NeoIndexService, how does that change matters? Since NeoIndexService only uses neo it should react properly to the transaction failure/success, weird that it didn't in your case. > > Philip > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >
_______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
