I guess a very natural place would be to add it to the neo-utils
Collection implementations. There's a lot of work in and around
collections already done there. Maybe I could take a look at extending
that implementation with Comparator.

2008/9/1 Johan Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think we could add a collection utility that keeps a set of nodes
> sorted according to a comparator given at creation time (of the
> collection utility). Later we could add support so an exception is
> thrown if the comparator is not serializable but for now we can just
> do a quick implementation where the right comparator has to be passed
> in constructor to maintain consistent state.
>
> I'll create a ticket for this and hopefully someone will see to it
> quite soon (we are currently quite busy with the upcoming release).
>
> -Johan
>
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 4:53 PM, Nils Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The comparator approach sounds more suited to me as well... sorting
>> should probably not be done in memory here, and it might make sense to
>> generate some indexes to allow quick filtering within that collection or
>> graph subset or so.
>>
>> Has anyone done anything similar yet? That requirement seems to be the
>> only thing preventing me to give a Neo4j a go (vs. for example jackrabbit).
>>
>> Please correct me if anything doesnt make sense!
>>
>> Nils
>>
>> Anders Nawroth schrieb:
>>> A sorted structure seems like a really good idea to me.
>>> But i'd rather like to see something more generic, where the user
>>> provides a Comparator<Node> implementation.
>>>
>>> One reason for this is that Strings can be sorted in different ways,
>>> using different Locales, case in/sensitive and so on. If there is a
>>> clear benefit from it, some common use cases could be covered by
>>> prebuilt Comparators. Or code snippets in the documentation (would be my
>>> choice) laying out common use cases.
>>>
>>> And the user could also do so much more fun things with a Comparator to
>>> play with :-)
>>>
>>> /anders
> _______________________________________________
> Neo mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to