On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:49 AM, Emil Eifrem <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 00:39, Lyudmila L. Balakireva <[email protected]> wrote: >> But I worry how it going to recover with billions nodes in it . It should >> be able to recover with the same memory used to write the indexes? > > Johan will have to chime in here with the specifics tomorrow (he's > asleep right now). But I believe the memory required here is depending > on the size of whatever non-completed transactions that existed when > the JVM crashed, not the total size of the node store.
That is correct. It would be possible to reduce memory usage during recovery but I have not implemented that since a recovered transaction will use less memory compared to non recovered transactions. -Johan _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
