Or sql server or oracle (gasp), which are much faster than mysql in many use cases...
The problem with any type of benchmark is that they tend to be very situational. But it is still valuable information, as long as it is viewed in context and not as an absolute. ------Original Message------ From: Laurent Laborde Sender: [email protected] To: Neo user discussions ReplyTo: Neo user discussions Subject: Re: [Neo] MySQL vs. Neo4j in a Breadth-First Graph Traversal Sent: Mar 30, 2010 3:11 AM On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Peter Neubauer <[email protected]> wrote: > > MySQL degrades as the data volume increases, and as the depth > increases (at depth 5 MySQL just hangs). You used MyIsam ? InnoDB ? What about postgresql ? (which is not supposed to be faster than MyIsam, but usually faster than InnoDB) -- Laurent "ker2x" Laborde Sysadmin & DBA at http://www.over-blog.com/ _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
