Yep, the full class name is expected. The meta model has (as you can tell) a
long way to go to become really useful and I see that you're really testing
and using this component.

Since we're not working on the meta model at the moment it'd be very nice if
you could fix/change/add stuff that doesn't work and supply patches or get
commit rights to that component or something like that!

Cheers,
Mattias

2010/4/6 Niels Hoogeveen <[email protected]>

>
> Thanks.
>
> I was trying to use the MetaModel without using the RDF layer, but I see I
> end up duplicating a lot of functionality that way. Maybe time to move to
> the RDF side of things.
>
> Kind regards,
> Niels Hoogeveen
>
> > From: [email protected]
> > To: [email protected]
> > Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:38:51 -0400
> > Subject: Re: [Neo] DatatypeClassRange usage
> >
> > In "theory" the isAssignableFrom method on the underlying MetaModel &
> Range
> > classes should be able to test for a legal/automatic type conversion, but
> it
> > looks like that code is commented out in the current version of the
> > Validator class.  In any case, it certainly seems that using the normal
> > reference classes for the primitive types should work fine.  Nullability
> is
> > another benefit of using the reference classes.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On
> > Behalf Of Niels Hoogeveen
> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 8:42 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [Neo] DatatypeClassRange usage
> >
> >
> > If only reference classes can be added, what are appropriate types.
> Should I
> > use java.lang.Integer when the underlying property value is and "int" and
> > java.lang.Long when using a "long"?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Niels Hoogeveen
> >
> > > From: [email protected]
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2010 01:52:06 +0200
> > > Subject: [Neo] DatatypeClassRange usage
> > >
> > >
> > > To model the datatype of a property, I tried to use the
> > DatatypeClassRange. It seems this object only accepts reference classes,
> not
> > primitive classes.
> > >
> > > I would like to state that a certain MetaModelProperty has the datatype
> > "int". To do so, I thought I would have to provide the MetaModelProperty
> > with a PropertyRange. The DatatypeClassRange seemed the only suitable
> > option, but its fromStringRepresentation method loads the class through a
> > Class.forName, so class "int", is of course not found, and the load of
> the
> > PropertyRange results in a ClassNotFoundException.
> > >
> > > Is this a bug, is this a feature?
> > >
> > > Kind regards,
> > > Niels Hoogeveen
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's
> FREE!
> > > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Neo mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Neo mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more.
> http://windows.microsoft.com/shop
> _______________________________________________
> Neo mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>



-- 
Mattias Persson, [[email protected]]
Hacker, Neo Technology
www.neotechnology.com
_______________________________________________
Neo mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to