Yeah, I choked on my coffee when I read FlockDB described as a 'graph db'. Its a key / value store with the ability to create relationships between keys.
I hope projects like this misusing the 'graph db' term will not tarnish the reputation of 'proper' graph dbs! Al On 12 April 2010 22:06, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > > I saw this on Twitter: > > "dviner @wbelk haven't looked at neo4j. seems hard to look at a > non-distributed graph db when a distributed graph db is also available." > > Seems like people think "graphdb" means "graphdb" .... FlockDB is not > traversal ready (at least how I see it from their writing and their > implementation)... Neo4j will now have to explain itself ... > > Bummers, > Marko. > > http://markorodriguez.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Dr Alastair James CTO James Publishing Ltd. http://www.linkedin.com/pub/3/914/163 www.worldreviewer.com WINNER Travolution Awards Best Travel Information Website 2009 WINNER IRHAS Awards, Los Angeles, Best Travel Website 2008 WINNER Travolution Awards Best New Online Travel Company 2008 WINNER Travel Weekly Magellan Award 2008 WINNER Yahoo! Finds of the Year 2007 "Noli nothis permittere te terere!" _______________________________________________ Neo mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
