Hi, Okay. I just removed it from Blueprints and everything compiled and all the test cases passed. Thus, all is "perfect." :)
Thanks, Marko. On May 31, 2010, at 9:20 AM, Mattias Persson wrote: > To clarify: the Isolation levels (and implementation of it) in index > service had a lot of problems which should've displayed themselves if > someone actually used them. I saw that blueprints used > Isolation.SAME_TX which is the default (and the only useful isolation, > looking at the code). > > Based on that, and that I bumped into a problem regarding isolation > recently I decided to remove it entirely, although I've wanted to do > that for quite some time now. Ahhh, now I feel great. > > 2010/5/31, Mattias Persson <[email protected]>: >> Just don't use it and you'll be fine >> >> 2010/5/31, Marko Rodriguez <[email protected]>: >>> Hello, >>> >>> The following method seems to have gone away from the Neo4j API: >>> >>> LuceneIndexService.setIsolation(Isolation.SAME_TX); >>> >>> Just comment it out and no longer use it? Or has it morphed into >>> something >>> else? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Marko. >>> >>> http://markorodriguez.com >>> http://tinkerpop.com >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Neo4j mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] >> Hacker, Neo Technology >> www.neotechnology.com >> > > > -- > Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] > Hacker, Neo Technology > www.neotechnology.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
