Hi there,
let me get back to you on that in a few days, need to talk to some
more educated sources on that in order to to say anything incorrect.

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

VP Product Development, Neo Technology

GTalk:      neubauer.peter
Skype       peter.neubauer
Phone       +46 704 106975
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.



On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 4:51 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So, in this case the free commercial license would be the only option.
>
> I have been working on an AGPL Clojure interface to Neo4j (but it's a bit out 
> of date at the moment). There are other forks licensed in public domain. It 
> seems that licensing them under something else then AGPL is strictly speaking 
> illegal? However, AGPL prevents the ones who purchase a commercial license 
> from using the interface. I suppose another license would be needed for that. 
> A bit unpractical situation.
>
> m.
>
>
> Craig Taverner [[email protected]] kirjoitti:
>> I believe that according to the spirit of the GPL/AGPL (and perhaps the
>> letter too), the correct implementation of option one would require writing
>> an alternative to Neo4j. Someone else mentioned 'glue code'. In principle
>> your application should be able to do its job (or at the very least start up
>> and run) without Neo4j, and then the user would download and install Neo4j
>> themselves to achieve an 'upgrade'.
>>
>> Exactly what the glue code is, or the alternative to Neo4j is, depends on
>> your application. If the application only uses Neo4j for some limited
>> features, perhaps it is good enough to just not have those features work.
>> But if a graph database, or graph data model, is central to your
>> applications purpose, then you probably need an alternative to neo4j for a
>> distributable open source release.
>>
>> I am not a lawyer, and I might be entirely wrong here, but I have a strong
>> suspicion that distributing an application that cannot work at all, until
>> the user downloads and installs the Neo4j component, would not pass muster.
>>
>> (P.S. all of the above is assuming the embedded Neo4j, and therefor
>> 'linking' to Neo4j).
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to