2010/10/18, Yaniv Ben Yosef <yani...@gmail.com>:
> Hi Mattias,
>
> While taking a closer look at the code, I realized there's an AllSimplePaths
> class, which can be easily modified to filter paths whose length isn't
> maxDepth (with an extra argument or subclass). I think that's the simplest
> solution, but I'm not clear on why pathsWithLength() uses ShortestPath
> rather than AllPaths.. Is there an efficiency gain here that I don't see?
>

Currently the AllSimplePaths traverses in one direction only, whereas
ShortestPath traverser from both directions (start and end node)
interleaved, making it more efficient.

Filtering paths from AllSimplePaths will do the trick, but patching
ShortestPath will give better performance!

> And a newbie question: I checked out the algo component (via the 0.7-1.2.M01
> tag). I have no trouble building it, but Maven doesn't create a JAR package
> of it (the target directory only has classes). Is there a different pom.xml
> I should use (I used the one in the root of the component directory)? I
> gather it has to be automated somewhere.
>
> Thanks!
>
> --- Yaniv
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Mattias Persson <matt...@neotechnology.com
>> wrote:
>
>> 2010/10/18 Yaniv Ben Yosef <yani...@gmail.com>
>>
>> > Thanks, I figured that..
>> > Would you be so kind reviewing the code once I finish it?
>> >
>> Sure!
>>
>> >
>> > --- Yaniv
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Mattias Persson
>> > <matt...@neotechnology.com>wrote:
>> >
>> > > 2010/10/18, Yaniv Ben Yosef <yani...@gmail.com>:
>> > > > Thanks Mattias!
>> > > > Do you have an expected time-frame for that? Alternatively, do you
>> have
>> > > any
>> > > > quick tips on how I would go and implement this myself? I  very
>> briefly
>> > > > scanned the code in org.neo4j.graphalgo.impl.path.ShortestPath and I
>> > > suspect
>> > > > I should test whether a node has already been visited (in
>> > > > goOneStep()
>> > > > perhaps?).
>> > > > Would you say that's the right approach?
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks again,
>> > >
>> > > Unfortunately it's hard to estimate when there's time to do it.
>> > >
>> > > Your suggestion sounds reasonable, but keep in mind that the algo is
>> > > used for the shortest path calculation as well. So an extra argument
>> > > in the constructor for ignoring loopy paths when finding paths of a
>> > > certain length would be the way to go IMO.
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > --- Yaniv
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Mattias Persson <
>> > > matt...@neotechnology.com
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> I just realized (it was me who put it there) that the documentation
>> is
>> > > >> wrong. That one allows cyclic paths, as you obviously noticed :).
>> I'll
>> > > try
>> > > >> to add a simplePathsWithLength method also to take care of that...
>> > > >>
>> > > >> 2010/10/17 Yaniv Ben Yosef <yani...@gmail.com>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> > Sure :) Will be happy to get your feedback.
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > --- Yaniv
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:24 PM, Peter Neubauer <
>> > > >> > peter.neuba...@neotechnology.com> wrote:
>> > > >> >
>> > > >> > > Hi Yaniv,
>> > > >> > > thanks for the report, I will take a look at it tomorrow if
>> > > >> > > that
>> > is
>> > > >> > > ok?
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > Cheers,
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > /peter neubauer
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > VP Product Management, Neo Technology
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > GTalk:      neubauer.peter
>> > > >> > > Skype       peter.neubauer
>> > > >> > > Phone       +46 704 106975
>> > > >> > > LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
>> > > >> > > Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance
>> graph
>> > > >> > database.
>> > > >> > > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest
>> Bring-a-Thing
>> > > >> party.
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Yaniv Ben Yosef <
>> > yani...@gmail.com
>> > > >
>> > > >> > > wrote:
>> > > >> > > > Hi,
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I am playing with Neo4J version 1.2 M1, specifically
>> > > >> > > > with GraphAlgoFactory.pathsWithLength(). According to the
>> > javadoc,
>> > > >> > > > it
>> > > >> > > should
>> > > >> > > > never return paths with loops.
>> > > >> > > > However, it seems like it does. I created a simple test case
>> to
>> > > >> > > demonstrate
>> > > >> > > > that: http://snipt.org/kpwn/
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > I expect the code not to show any path, but instead it prints
>> > the
>> > > >> > > following
>> > > >> > > > path:
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Path: A -> B -> C -> B
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Please let me know if there's any fault on my side, or if
>> that's
>> > a
>> > > >> bug.
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > > Thanks,
>> > > >> > > > Yaniv
>> > > >> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > >> > > > Neo4j mailing list
>> > > >> > > > User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > > >> > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> > > >> > > >
>> > > >> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > >> > > Neo4j mailing list
>> > > >> > > User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > > >> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> > > >> > >
>> > > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > > >> > Neo4j mailing list
>> > > >> > User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > > >> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> > > >> >
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> --
>> > > >> Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com]
>> > > >> Hacker, Neo Technology
>> > > >> www.neotechnology.com
>> > > >> _______________________________________________
>> > > >> Neo4j mailing list
>> > > >> User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > > >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> > > >>
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > Neo4j mailing list
>> > > > User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com]
>> > > Hacker, Neo Technology
>> > > www.neotechnology.com
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Neo4j mailing list
>> > > User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Neo4j mailing list
>> > User@lists.neo4j.org
>> > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com]
>> Hacker, Neo Technology
>> www.neotechnology.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> User@lists.neo4j.org
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> User@lists.neo4j.org
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>


-- 
Mattias Persson, [matt...@neotechnology.com]
Hacker, Neo Technology
www.neotechnology.com
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
User@lists.neo4j.org
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to