Axel,
nice it worked out for you! Would be great if you could write up a
small blog or so on this, and give us some feedback on what to improve
to make the component more usable. WDYT?

Cheers,

/peter neubauer

GTalk:      neubauer.peter
Skype       peter.neubauer
Phone       +46 704 106975
LinkedIn   http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer
Twitter      http://twitter.com/peterneubauer

http://www.neo4j.org               - Your high performance graph database.
http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party.



On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Axel Morgner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 02.11.2010 14:52, Craig Taverner wrote:
>>> Adding neo4j spatial to the picture should enable the CMS handling geo
>>> data objects without adding to much complexity (I hope).
>> OK. I think I'm beginning to get an idea of what you want. You have a CMS,
>> and some of the data is geolocated, in the sense that you know what
>> countries it is associated with, and perhaps you even have relationships to
>> 'country' nodes (or other nodes) representing locations. Now you want to use
>> Neo4j Spatial to perform simple spatial queries on this.
> Your analysis is correct and brilliant. :-)
>
> In my case, the CMS payload data itself (like HTML, Images, Videos, CSS,
> JS, Blogs etc.) is stored in neo4j nodes. But logging data, too, of course.
>
>>   I could imagine something like:
>>
>> 'give me all countries in the specified region (bounding box) and include
>> the number of pages as an attribute of the result set'bute?
> Right now I'm using the SearchIntersectWindow class to determine which
> countries are needed to display within a certain global region. The
> countries data is loaded as a set of GeoJSON files via Javascript (using
> Polymaps), so neo4j spatial does only provide the country names.
>
>> I think you should either use the original shapefiles and the
>> existing ShapefileImporter or move to OSM data models for connected
>> topologies.
>>
>> A GeoJSON importer is a nice idea, but not worth the effort if you already
>> have shapefiles.
> Indeed! I ended up with using the shapefile importer, using neo4j
> spatial to serve geodata nodes which are then connected on-the-fly with
> geo-tagged CMS data.
>
> Your comments and suggestions helped me a lot, so I just wanted to say
> thanks again.
>
> Axel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neo4j mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to