On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 12:34 PM, George Ciubotaru <[email protected]> wrote: > > Taking a second look over that locking mechanism, I've noticed that it uses > read locks for a delete operation. Should there be write locks instead? >
Yes, sorry about that it should be write locks. The read locks will still allow for concurrent transactions to progress past the higher level check if the relationship has been deleted or not (resulting in a InvalidRecordException instead of a NotFoundException). Regards, Johan _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
