2011/2/15 Rick Bullotta <[email protected]> > Good question. Can fulltext indexing support multiple key names in the > same > index? If not, remove(T entity) would work, otherwise remove(T entity, > String key) would be needed. > > There can be multiple keys in one index, yes. I'd guess both is good to have. So you don't know which values you're removing at those points?
> > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On > Behalf Of Mattias Persson > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 5:24 PM > To: Neo4j user discussions > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Making sense of Lucene indexing in Neo 1.2 > > Do you want remove(T entity) or remove(T entity, String key) or both? Not > really a way around it a.t.m. > > 2011/2/15 Rick Bullotta <[email protected]> > > > Spare cycles? What are they? ;-) > > > > Any workaround in the interim? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > > On > > Behalf Of Mattias Persson > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 4:57 PM > > To: Neo4j user discussions > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Making sense of Lucene indexing in Neo 1.2 > > > > I'm spending spare cycles on that, and hope to get it pushed in pretty > > soon. > > > > 2011/2/15 Rick Bullotta <[email protected]> > > > > > One thing that seems to have changed dramatically is the "remove" > method. > > > In the previous implementation of fulltext indexing, it was not > necessary > > > to > > > pass the content in the remove() method, only the node and the key > name. > > > Can you explain how to achieve the same behavior in 1.2? > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] > > > On > > > Behalf Of Mattias Persson > > > Sent: Tuesday, February 15, 2011 3:58 PM > > > To: Neo4j user discussions > > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Making sense of Lucene indexing in Neo 1.2 > > > > > > Yes, the indexes are shutdown automatically, so you don't have to worry > > > about that. > > > > > > 2011/2/15 Rick Bullotta <[email protected]> > > > > > > > Also, how does this change to indexing affect online backup and > > > management > > > > of logical logs for Lucene? Does this happen automatically now based > > on > > > > whether or not logical logs are enabled for Neo? > > > > > > > > > > You mean if neo4j is configured to _keep_ logical logs or not, right? > > Each > > > index data source (f.ex. lucene-index) will have its own logical log, > > just > > > as with IndexService. The new and better backup > > > component<http://wiki.neo4j.org/content/Backup>can backup indexes in > > > the new index framework, however not IndexService and > > > friends. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] > > Hacker, Neo Technology > > www.neotechnology.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > -- > Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] > Hacker, Neo Technology > www.neotechnology.com > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
