Duly updated, thanks for the feedback. Jim
On 22 Mar 2011, at 00:56, Emil Eifrem wrote: > Great post. Only thing I'd add is that a weakness of 1 & 2 is that > while they scale ~linearly for reads, they don't scale writes. Maybe > that's obvious but it may be worth pointing out anyway. > > Cheers, > > -EE > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 17:47, Jim Webber <[email protected]> wrote: >> With especial thanks to Mark Harwood and Alex Averbuch, I wrote this on >> approaches for scaling: >> >> http://jim.webber.name/2011/03/22/ef4748c3-6459-40b6-bcfa-818960150e0f.aspx >> >> Your thoughts would be most welcome. >> >> Jim >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > > > > -- > Emil Eifrém, CEO [[email protected]] > Neo Technology, www.neotechnology.com > Cell: +46 733 462 271 | US: 206 403 8808 > http://blogs.neotechnology.com/emil > http://twitter.com/emileifrem _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
