Using 1.3-M03 here. I also try to reproduce it with an isolated test. Will keep you informed about the result.
Axel On 01.04.2011 11:01, Mattias Persson wrote: > 2011/4/1 Michael Hunger<[email protected]> > >> What about the line in the if that doesn't execute the block, if >> index-hits .hasNext() returns false? >> >> Does this close the underlying structures ? >> >>>> if (hits != null&& hits.iterator().hasNext()) { > As of some milestone back it closes the iterator if there are no results in > it. Which version of neo4j are you running Alex? > >> and here 2 iterators are opened? perhaps this might be a problem, one for >> the if, the second for the for-each loop >> > Actually IndexHits is cheating where #iterator() {return this;} so there's > only one iterator. > > As a note I can say that I'm currently running a test with 30 threads, > randomly modifying/querying an index where some queries are looped through > and some just a bit and then closed manually. Also getSingle() is used > randomly. And as far as I can see, after 10 minutes of such a test running > the number of open files is kept it a steady low. I just cannot reproduce > this on the latest milestone. _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
