Hi Jim. Actually there is more than one. The code is already in production, so we are not eager to move too early on new versions. Moreover, we have very small databases and performance is not an issue, so the _only_ driver for upgrade would be the fixing of specific (this :-) ) bugs. We've not yet managed to reproduce the bug reliably in our lab environment, so testing against the latest release is not yet possible effectively; we'll try as soon as we can, but would greatly appreciate any insight that was gained after the analysis of the data provided by the thread openers. Thanks for your interest. Francesco
Il 5 aprile 2011 alle 21.54 Jim Webber <[email protected]> ha scritto: > Hi Francesco, > > Is there a compelling reason why you need to be on Neo 1.1? We're in the > process of releasing 1.3 which has substantial advantages over 1.1 (larger > databases, performance improvements, bug fixes). > > Could you run a quick experiment on one of the 1.3 milestone builds and > perhaps plan to migrate to 1.3 from there? > > Jim > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
