I don't think analogous_in/analogous_out is necessary because you can probably separate them by their direction. Just have:
(A)--[analogous_to]-->(L)--[analogous_to]-->(B) and incoming relationship to L is "from" and outgoing is "to" so to speak. 2011/4/27 James Thornton <[email protected]>: > Hey Marko - > > Is there a convention for labeling the (now two) edges? > > For example, if you insert a "link node" between A and B, when you are > saying A is analogous to B: > > A -- analogous_to --> B > > ...becomes... > > A -- analogous_to_in --> (L) -- analogous_to_out --> B > > The analogous_to_in/analogous_to_out is a little clunky -- is there a > cleaner way to represent this? > > Thanks. > > - James > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 10:18 AM, James Thornton > <[email protected]> wrote: >> What's the best way emulate edges to edges, like in a hypergraph? >> >> For nodes A and B, you create a "link node" between them, such as: >> >> A -> (L) -> B >> >> Is there a better way? >> >> Thanks. >> >> - James >> > > > > -- > Latest Blog: http://jamesthornton.com/blog/how-to-get-to-genius > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > -- Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] Hacker, Neo Technology www.neotechnology.com _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
