Hi Guys,
We currently thinking of how we can get type safety when we do queries, one thing we do is have a category nodes, so e.g. Here is a sample query IEnumerable<User> list = g.v(0).outE[[label:'HOSTS']].inV[[Key:'MyCompanyName']].inE[[label:'IS_COMPANY']].inV So the part highlighted in bold leverages the category. However, we could also remove the category node (Agencies) and then just have more explicit relationships e.g. IEnumerable<User> list = g.v(0).outE[[label:'HOSTS_AGENCY']].inV[[Key:'MyCompanyName']]. Notice, here we now have a relationship where from the name we can see that the types coming back will always be an Agency. This means relationship names have information about it's target Node type, making the amount of relationships proportional to the number of node types. What are the advantages/disadvantages of both approaches, which achieve the same result? Regards _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
