Awesome. Thank you. For this particular property, we're not using Lucene syntax since this is an "exact" index, and fortunately, having the + (URL-encoded as %2B) in the REST API index lookup URL works just fine.
Aseem On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Rick Bullotta <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes, there is. Just escape it with the \ character. > > See: http://ifdefined.com/btnet/lucene_syntax.html#+ > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Aseem Kishore > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 5:02 PM > To: Neo4j user discussions > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] Constraints on index key names? > > Thanks all! > > Re: lucene syntax - is there no way to "escape" the plus in queries? > > Aseem > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Mattias Persson > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > Jacob, you're talking about index names... I think the initial question > was > > regarding keys in key/value pairs, for which neo4j adds no restrictions. > > > > 2011/7/13 Jacob Hansson <[email protected]> > > > > > I'm not sure if there is anything keeping you from using them, but the > > > names > > > 'node_auto_index' and 'relationship_auto_index' are used by the auto > > > indexing subsystem. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Mattias Persson > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > Yes, the neo4j integration doesn't impose any additional restrictions > > > other > > > > than those (if any) of Lucene. > > > > > > > > 2011/7/12 Rick Bullotta <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > That would conflict with lucene's query syntax, I'd think. > > > > > ________________________________________ > > > > > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] > On > > > > > Behalf Of Aseem Kishore [[email protected]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 7:41 PM > > > > > To: Neo4j user discussions > > > > > Subject: [Neo4j] Constraints on index key names? > > > > > > > > > > Is there any constraint on what an index key is allowed to be > named? > > > E.g. > > > > > can it have a '+' in its name? > > > > > > > > > > Aseem > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > > > [email protected] > > > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] > > > > Hacker, Neo Technology > > > > www.neotechnology.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > > [email protected] > > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jacob Hansson > > > Phone: +46 (0) 763503395 > > > Twitter: @jakewins > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Mattias Persson, [[email protected]] > > Hacker, Neo Technology > > www.neotechnology.com > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
