If you look at the comments of the post - groovy is only that slow if you implement all the algorithm details in groovy !
Gremlin uses blueprints which is written in Java. Gremlin is just a DSL on top of that API so it is just used for the construction of the underlying pipeline. Anyway, easiest way to see if that holds true is to write a PoC for _your_ domain, I think general statements are difficult. But probably Marko has some nice performance benchmarks at hand. Michael Am 23.07.2011 um 09:51 schrieb Josef Holy: > Hi all, > > has someone on this list any practical experience with using Gremlin for > traversing the EmbeddedGraphDatabase in a production environment? What > interests me is how it performs compared to the traversal algorithms written > directly against Neo4j APIs (using Traverser, TraversalDescription, ..etc). > > As Gremlin runs on top of Groovy + Pipes + Blueprints, I would expect it to > be much slower than pure Neo4j Java APIs (but really SO much slower? > http://stronglytypedblog.blogspot.com/2009/07/java-vs-scala-vs-groovy-performance.html > ) . > > > Thanks for any comments/experiences! > > > Josef. > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
