It is a put right now and the semantics are clear I think, update means add
stuff that isn't there and change stuff that's different. Adding an empty
value should clear that value and not including means do nothing.

>
> When updating is really important in the rest context is in batching,
> basically, now, there is no way to batch update efficiently. You have to
> query for the nodes you want to change and send that call and then add to
> those values in code and then send the values back as an overwrite. Javier's
> excellent REST lib makes this a little easier code wise, but suffers from
> being unusably slow for large updates because of this REST limitation.
>
> If infact this is the reasoning (what to do with missing values) behind
> making it a replace and not an update, I vote for changing it to update.
>
> Furthermore, I believe that calling a named resource with a PUT and
> overwriting it violates RESTfull design. i.e. Put to /node/0 should
> overwrite, while /node/0/properties should update.
>
> See this link:
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Representational_State_Transfer#RESTful_web_services
>
> (I know wikipedia references are not that strong, but this is straight out
> of an o'rielly design patterns book which is a little stronger :))
>
> I don't mean to start a holy war about standards (rest isn't really a
> standard anyway), I'm just saying that currently this feature doesn't work
> as advertised and makes it hard to update large datasets quickly via rest.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Jim Webber <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Feature (though perhaps PUT) would be a better choice of method. POSTing a
>> new set of properties can't update, because the semantics aren't clear -
>> what would it mean if a property was missing, is that an effective DELETE,
>> or an indication it should be left alone.
>>
>> Jim
>> _______________________________________________
>> Neo4j mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Neo4j mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user

Reply via email to