Yes. If you have performed a search and now have SpatialDatabaseRecord results, then that is the best method to use.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Christopher Schmidt < [email protected]> wrote: > So best is to use SpatialDatabaseRecord.getGeometry()? > > Christopher > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Craig Taverner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Actually we do allow multiple geometry types in the same layer, but some > > actions, like export to shapely, will fail. We even test for this in > > TestDynamicLayers. > > > > You can use the gtype if you want, but it is specific to some > > GeometryEncoders, and might change in future releases. It would be better > > to > > get the layers geometry encoder and use that. > > On Jul 27, 2011 6:04 PM, "Peter Neubauer" < > > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Christopher, > > > What do you mean by allowing to use? Yes, these properties are used to > > > store the Geometry Type for a Layer and for geometry nodes. Sadly, you > > > cannot have more than one Geometry in Layers due to the limitations of > > > e.g. the GeoTools stack. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > /peter neubauer > > > > > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > > > Skype peter.neubauer > > > Phone +46 704 106975 > > > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > > > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > > > > > http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph > > database. > > > http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. > > > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing > party. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 4:07 AM, Christopher Schmidt > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Hi all, > > >> > > >> is it allowed to use the gtype-property to get the geometry type > > numbers? > > >> > > >> (Which are defined in org.neo4j.gis.spatial.Constants) > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Christopher > > >> twitter: @fakod > > >> blog: http://blog.fakod.eu > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Neo4j mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Neo4j mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > > > > > -- > Christopher > twitter: @fakod > blog: http://blog.fakod.eu > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
