Jim, Can you tell me how to add my suggestions for a solution to this problem to your issue tracker? Niels
> From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 16:33:04 +0200 > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] partitioning the relationship store > > > The partitioning is a solution to the densely-connected node problem, but > would also allow for the iteration over RelationshipTypes/Directions, another > feature I would very much like to see. > I have posted suggestions on how to approach this problem and would like to > add those suggestions to the issue tracker so they will be taken into > consideration when addressing this issue. Yet I can't find an issue in > Lighthouse. > I am glad to hear it is #5 in priority order. > I would be extra pleased if devteam when picking up this issue would stay in > touch, because Enhanced API could greatly benefit depending on the approach > taken. > Niels > > > From: [email protected] > > Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:40:21 +0100 > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Neo4j] partitioning the relationship store > > > > Hi Niels, > > > > Is this partitioning an aspect of the supernode problem? If so, there is a > > feature request* in the devteam backlog for that. > > > > Jim > > > > * It is currently 5th in priority order. > > _______________________________________________ > > Neo4j mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
