Great to hear! So when you say binary protocol, you mean a binary interface besides the RESTful API? Yummy. Great!
Regards Thomas --- Thomas FRITZ web http://fritzthomas.com twitter http://twitter.com/thomasf 2011/8/29 Peter Neubauer <[email protected]>: > Thomas, > as mentioned, the binary protocol is pushed to Neo4j 1.6, but it WILL come. > > Cheers, > > /peter neubauer > > GTalk: neubauer.peter > Skype peter.neubauer > Phone +46 704 106975 > LinkedIn http://www.linkedin.com/in/neubauer > Twitter http://twitter.com/peterneubauer > > http://www.neo4j.org - Your high performance graph database. > http://startupbootcamp.org/ - Öresund - Innovation happens HERE. > http://www.thoughtmade.com - Scandinavia's coolest Bring-a-Thing party. > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Thomas Fritz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi >> >> Is there an official node.js binding for Neo4J? >> >> Is it possible to access the Neo4J Standalone version directly through >> a socket or anything with less overhead than the REST API? If not, is >> there a way to write a Neo4J "driver"? Is the socket communication >> documented? Or is it just Java RMI? >> >> Do you plan to give users a possibility to access a standalone server >> other than REST? >> >> How do you advise us to use neo4j standalone in a fast way from any >> language where there is no binding? >> >> >> Kind regards. >> >> >> --- >> Thomas FRITZ >> web http://fritzthomas.com >> twitter http://twitter.com/thomasf >> _______________________________________________ >> Neo4j mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user >> > _______________________________________________ > Neo4j mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user > _______________________________________________ Neo4j mailing list [email protected] https://lists.neo4j.org/mailman/listinfo/user
